Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research has a purpose to know the student’s difficulties in resolving PISA problems in Change and Relationship content for level 4, 5, and 6 in Junior High School. This is a descriptive research that has a purpose to identify and describe the student’s difficulties in resolving PISA problems in Change and Relationship content for level 4, 5, and 6. The subject of this research are 6 students of IX grade of SMP Negeri 1 Inderalaya. This research used data gathering technique that are written test and interview. The results of this research showed that students resolving PISA problems in Change and Relationship content for level 4, 5, and 6 felt difficult in understanding the problems, transforming real world problems into mathematics structure, solving the mathematics problem and interpreting mathematics solutions into the real world. The results show the difficulty in understanding the problem and transforming real world problems into mathematics structure is more dominant than the other difficulties.
Keywords
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2018 Maria Mareta Simalango, Darmawijoyo, Nyimas Aisyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA).
References
- Aisyah, N. (2003). Efektivitas pembelajaran problem based instruction (PBI) pada mata pelajaran matematika SLTP melalui pola kolaboratif. Jurnal pada Forum Kependidikan, 23 (1).
- Anggoro, T., dkk. (2007). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
- Anisah, Zulkardi & Darmawijoyo. (2011). Pengembangan soal matematika model PISA pada konten quantity untuk mengukur kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa sekolah menengah pertama. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5 (1).
- Cooper, B., & Dunne, M. (2000). Assessing Children’s Mathematical Knowledge: Social Class, Sex And Problem-Solving. Buckingham: Open University Press.
- De Lange, J. (2003). Mathematics for literacy. Dalam B. L. Madison & L. A. Steen (Eds.), Quantitative Literacy: Why numeracy matters for schools and colleges. (hal.75–89). Princeton, NJ: National Council on Education and Disciplines.
- Depdiknas. (2006). Standar Isi Mata Pelajaran Matematika SD/MI dan SMP/MTs (Permendiknas No. 22 Tahun 2006). Jakarta: Depdiknas.
- Edo, S. I.,Hartono, Y., & Putri, R. I. I. (2013). Investigating secondary school students’ difficulties in modeling problems PISA model level 5 and 6. Journal on Mathematics Education, 4 (1), 41-58.
- Kemendikbud. (2013). Pengembangan Kurikulum 2013. (Online (http://www.um.ac.id/data/download/file70EDCF85B75C26D549DBB671 CD8D98C4.pdf), diakses 20 Agustus 2016.
- Kemendikbud. (2014). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 104 Tahun 2014 tentang Penilaian Hasil Belajar oleh Pendidik pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
- NCTM. (2000). Principles and standard for school mathematics. Reston: VA.
- Novita, R., Zulkardi, & Hartono, Y. (2012). Exploring primary student’s problem-solving ability by doing tasks like PISA’s question. Journal on Mathematics Education, 3 (2): 133-150.
- OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Result in Focus. (Online), (www.oecd.org), diakses 10 Desember 2016. OECD. (2016). PISA Test. (Online (www.oecd.org/pisa/test), diakses 13 April 2017.
- OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Result in Focus. (Online), (https://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfinding/pisa-2012-result-overview.pdf), diakses 25 April 2016.
- OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving, and Financial Literacy. (Online), (www.oecd.org), diakses pada 25 April 2016.
- Stacey, K. (2011). The PISA View of Mathematical Literacy in Indonesia. Journal on Mathematics Education (IndoMS-JME), 2 (2), 95-126.
- Wijaya, A., Heuvel-Panhuizen, M.V.D, Doorman, M., & Robitzsch, A. (2014). Difficulties in Solving Context-based PISA Mathematics Task: An Analysis of Student’s Errors. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11 (3), 555-584.
References
Aisyah, N. (2003). Efektivitas pembelajaran problem based instruction (PBI) pada mata pelajaran matematika SLTP melalui pola kolaboratif. Jurnal pada Forum Kependidikan, 23 (1).
Anggoro, T., dkk. (2007). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
Anisah, Zulkardi & Darmawijoyo. (2011). Pengembangan soal matematika model PISA pada konten quantity untuk mengukur kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa sekolah menengah pertama. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5 (1).
Cooper, B., & Dunne, M. (2000). Assessing Children’s Mathematical Knowledge: Social Class, Sex And Problem-Solving. Buckingham: Open University Press.
De Lange, J. (2003). Mathematics for literacy. Dalam B. L. Madison & L. A. Steen (Eds.), Quantitative Literacy: Why numeracy matters for schools and colleges. (hal.75–89). Princeton, NJ: National Council on Education and Disciplines.
Depdiknas. (2006). Standar Isi Mata Pelajaran Matematika SD/MI dan SMP/MTs (Permendiknas No. 22 Tahun 2006). Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Edo, S. I.,Hartono, Y., & Putri, R. I. I. (2013). Investigating secondary school students’ difficulties in modeling problems PISA model level 5 and 6. Journal on Mathematics Education, 4 (1), 41-58.
Kemendikbud. (2013). Pengembangan Kurikulum 2013. (Online (http://www.um.ac.id/data/download/file70EDCF85B75C26D549DBB671 CD8D98C4.pdf), diakses 20 Agustus 2016.
Kemendikbud. (2014). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 104 Tahun 2014 tentang Penilaian Hasil Belajar oleh Pendidik pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standard for school mathematics. Reston: VA.
Novita, R., Zulkardi, & Hartono, Y. (2012). Exploring primary student’s problem-solving ability by doing tasks like PISA’s question. Journal on Mathematics Education, 3 (2): 133-150.
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Result in Focus. (Online), (www.oecd.org), diakses 10 Desember 2016. OECD. (2016). PISA Test. (Online (www.oecd.org/pisa/test), diakses 13 April 2017.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Result in Focus. (Online), (https://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfinding/pisa-2012-result-overview.pdf), diakses 25 April 2016.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving, and Financial Literacy. (Online), (www.oecd.org), diakses pada 25 April 2016.
Stacey, K. (2011). The PISA View of Mathematical Literacy in Indonesia. Journal on Mathematics Education (IndoMS-JME), 2 (2), 95-126.
Wijaya, A., Heuvel-Panhuizen, M.V.D, Doorman, M., & Robitzsch, A. (2014). Difficulties in Solving Context-based PISA Mathematics Task: An Analysis of Student’s Errors. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11 (3), 555-584.