Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Teaching fast learning students is not enough by giving them ordinary mathematics problems. Teaching activities for fast learning students bring consequence for teacher to modify teaching activities from regular to activity that needs Higher Order Thinking skills. Therefore, it is need to develop problems to measure higher order thinking skills. This study aims to (1) produce a valid and practical prototype problems to measure Higher Order Thinking skills in Number Sequences and Series for Acceleration Class Grade IX (2) see the effects of the problems to measure higher order thinking skills on students’ achievement in Number Sequence and Series was tried out to students of acceleration class grade IX. This study use development research that consists of analyzing, designing, evaluating, and revising. The instrument for collecting data is written test. Test is used to see students’ achievement in Number Sequences and Series. All data are analyzed using descriptive technique. Subjects in this research are students of Acceleration Class Grade IX of SMP Xaverius Maria Palembang. The total subject are 22 students The results of analysis are: (1) problems prototype which is developed has been valid and practical. (2) based on developing process can be obtained that problems which is developed contains potential effect to higher order thinking skills of Acceleration Class Grade IX of SMP Xaverius Maria Palembang shown by written test result score 35.59. It means that students’ thinking skill is good category. The final conclusion is the problems which is developed can be used to measure higher order thinking skills in Number Sequence and Series.
DOI: 10.22342/jpm.3.2.326
Keywords
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2009 Lewy, Zulkardi, Nyimas Aisyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA).
References
- Akker, J.v.d. 1999. Principles and Methods of Development Research. Dalam J.v.d Akker (Ed). Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Bloom. 1964. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive Domain
- Butkowski, Jean. 1994. Improving Student Higher Order Thinking Skills in Mathematics. Tesis, Educational Resources Information Center
- Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2008. Pengembangan Kurikulum (Buku Suplemen Kurikulum CI/BI) Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Direktorat Pembinaan Pendidikan Luar Biasa
- Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.2007. Penatalaksanaan Psikologi Program Akselerasi Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Direktorat Pembinaan Pendidikan Luar Biasa
- Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 20 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
- Fadjar Shadiq, M.App Sc,Laporan Hasil Seminar dan Lokakarya Pembelajaran Matematika 15-16 Maret 2007 di P4TK (PPPG) Matematika Yogyakarta
- Forehand, M .2005. Bloom Taxonomy: Original and Revised tersedia di http://www.coe.uga.edu/epltt/bloom.html (diakses tanggal 30 Desember 2008)
- Krathwohl, Bloom & Masia.1964. The Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook II
- Krathwohl, D. R. 2002. A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: an overview - Theory Into Practice,College of Education, The Ohio State University Learning Domains or Bloom's Taxonomy: The Three Types of Learning, tersedia di www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/bloom.html
- Pohl. 2000. Learning to Think, Thinking to Learn: tersedia di www.purdue.edu/geri
- Raudenbush, Stephen W.1992.Teaching for Higher-Order Thinking in Secondary Schools: Effects of Curriculum, Teacher Preparation, and School Organization. Center for Research on the Context of Secondary School Teaching. Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED), Washington, DC
- Thompson, Tony. Mathematics Teachers’ Interpretation of Higher Order Thinking In Bloom Taxonomy, International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education Volume 3, Number 2, July 2008 tersedia di www.iejme.com
- Zulkardi. 2002. Developing a Learning Environment on Realistic Mathematics Education for Indonesian student teachers. Disertasi. (http://projects.edte.utwente.nl/cascade/imei/dissertation/disertasi.html. (diakses tanggal 10 Desember 2008)
- Zulkardi. 2006. Formatif Evaluation : What, Why, When, and How. (On Line). Tersedia : http://www.geocities.com/zulkardi/books.html. (diakses : 14 Desember 2008)
References
Akker, J.v.d. 1999. Principles and Methods of Development Research. Dalam J.v.d Akker (Ed). Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bloom. 1964. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive Domain
Butkowski, Jean. 1994. Improving Student Higher Order Thinking Skills in Mathematics. Tesis, Educational Resources Information Center
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2008. Pengembangan Kurikulum (Buku Suplemen Kurikulum CI/BI) Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Direktorat Pembinaan Pendidikan Luar Biasa
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.2007. Penatalaksanaan Psikologi Program Akselerasi Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Direktorat Pembinaan Pendidikan Luar Biasa
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 20 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Fadjar Shadiq, M.App Sc,Laporan Hasil Seminar dan Lokakarya Pembelajaran Matematika 15-16 Maret 2007 di P4TK (PPPG) Matematika Yogyakarta
Forehand, M .2005. Bloom Taxonomy: Original and Revised tersedia di http://www.coe.uga.edu/epltt/bloom.html (diakses tanggal 30 Desember 2008)
Krathwohl, Bloom & Masia.1964. The Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook II
Krathwohl, D. R. 2002. A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: an overview - Theory Into Practice,College of Education, The Ohio State University Learning Domains or Bloom's Taxonomy: The Three Types of Learning, tersedia di www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/bloom.html
Pohl. 2000. Learning to Think, Thinking to Learn: tersedia di www.purdue.edu/geri
Raudenbush, Stephen W.1992.Teaching for Higher-Order Thinking in Secondary Schools: Effects of Curriculum, Teacher Preparation, and School Organization. Center for Research on the Context of Secondary School Teaching. Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED), Washington, DC
Thompson, Tony. Mathematics Teachers’ Interpretation of Higher Order Thinking In Bloom Taxonomy, International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education Volume 3, Number 2, July 2008 tersedia di www.iejme.com
Zulkardi. 2002. Developing a Learning Environment on Realistic Mathematics Education for Indonesian student teachers. Disertasi. (http://projects.edte.utwente.nl/cascade/imei/dissertation/disertasi.html. (diakses tanggal 10 Desember 2008)
Zulkardi. 2006. Formatif Evaluation : What, Why, When, and How. (On Line). Tersedia : http://www.geocities.com/zulkardi/books.html. (diakses : 14 Desember 2008)