Main Article Content

Abstract

The connection ability and disposition of mathematics of junior high school students still need to be improved. This research purpose to analyze the enhancement of connection of mathematics abilities and mathematical dispositions of students who received CORE learning models and conventional learning and to analyze the correlation between the connection abilities and students’ dispositions. This study uses the embedded type Mixed Method. The population was all eighth-grade students one of the public junior high schools in Pangalengan, Bandung Regency, and the sample involved as many as 74 students. The instruments used were a mathematical connection ability test, a disposition questionnaire, an observation sheet, and an interview guide. Analysis of data used two Independent Sample t-Test and Mann Whitney test. The results showed that: 1) the improvement of the connection ability of students who received CORE learning was better than students who received conventional learning 2) the disposition of students who received the CORE learning model was better than students who received conventional learning models, 3) there was no relationship between connection ability and disposition of students using the CORE learning model. The conclusion is CORE model is effective to improve students' mathematical connection ability and mathematical disposition.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.16.2.17079.187-202

Keywords

Two Variable Linear Equation System Confidence Reflection

Article Details

How to Cite
Supianti , I. I., Yaniawati, P., Ramadhan, A. G., Setyaji, M., & Puspitasari, P. (2024). Improving Connection Ability and Mathematical Disposition of Junior High School Students with Connecting, Organizing, Reflecting, Extending (CORE) Learning Model. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 16(2), 187–202. Retrieved from https://jpm.ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jpm/article/view/189

References

  1. Agustianti, R. & Amelia, R. (2018). Analysis of Students' Mathematical Connection Ability Using the CORE Learning Model. JPMI Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Inovatif, 1(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v1i1.p1-6
  2. Akbar, P., Hamid, A., Bernard, M., & Sugandi, AI (2017). Analysis of Problem Solving Ability and Mathematical Disposition of Class XI Students of SMA Putra Juang in Opportunity Material. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v2i1.62
  3. Anggraini, D., Kartono, K., & Veronica, R. B. (2015). The Effectiveness of Core Learning Assisted by Work Cards on Achieving Mathematics Problem Ability and Self-confidence of Class VIII Students. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v4i2.8497
  4. Astuti, P., Hartono, Y., Bunayati, H., & Indaryanti, I. (2017). Development of Worksheets Based on Mathematical Modeling Approach to Practice Mathematical Connection Ability of Class VIII Junior High School Students. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.11.2.4613.61-78
  5. Azizah, F., Surahmat, S., & Walida, E. S. (2020). Mathematics Problem Solving Ability and Student Interest in Learning through the CORE Learning Model (Connecting, Organizing, Reflecting, and Extending). Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran, 15(18). http://riset.unisma.ac.id/index.php/jp3/article/view/5918
  6. Deswita, R. (2020). Improving Students' Mathematical Self Efficacy through CORE Learning Model With Scientific Approach. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 173-181.
  7. Dolores-Flores, C., Rivera-López, MI, & García-García, J. (2019). Exploring Mathematical Connections of Pre-University Students Through Tasks Involving Rates of Change. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(3), 369–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1507050
  8. Eli, J. A., Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., & Lee, C. W. (2013). Mathematical Connections and Their Relationship to Mathematics Knowledge for Teaching Geometry. School Science and Mathematics, 113(3), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12009
  9. Fatimah, A. E. & Khairunnisah. (2019). Increasing Mathematical Connection Ability through Connecting-Organizing-Reflecting-Extending (CORE) Model Learning. MES: Journal of Mathematics Education and Science, 5(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.30743/mes.v5i1.1933
  10. Fisher, D., Yaniawati, P., & Kusumah, Y. S. (2017). The Use of CORE Model by Metacognitive Skill Approach in Developing Characters Junior High School Students. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868(August). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995137
  11. Hendriana, H., Rohaeti, E. E., & Sumarmo, U. (2017). Students' Mathematics Hard Skills and Soft Skills. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
  12. Indrawan & Yaniawati. (2016). Research methodology. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.
  13. Indriani, N. D. & Noordyana, M. A. (2021). Mathematical Connection Ability Through Connecting, Organizing, Reflecting, and Extending Learning Models and Means Ends Analysis. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1, 339–352.
  14. Irawan, S., & Iasha, V. (2021). Core Learning Model and Mathematical Disposition on Mathematics Problem Solving Ability of Elementary School Students. Jurnal Buana Pendidikan, 17(2), 122–129. https://doi.org/10.36456/bp.vol17.no2.a3942
  15. Islami, M. D., Sunardi, S., & Slamin, S. (2018). The Mathematical Connections Process of Junior High School Students with High and Low Logical-Mathematical Intelligence in Solving Geometry Problems. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science, 5(4), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.5.4.3
  16. Istiqomah, Q. & Nurulhaq, C. (2021). Comparison of Students' Mathematical Connection Ability between Discovery Learning and Expository Learning Models. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 135-144.
  17. Jahring, J. (2020). Mathematical Connection Ability in Connecting, Organizing, Reflecting, Extending and Numbered Head Together Learning Models. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 182–189. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i1.2667
  18. Kariadinata, R., Yaniawati, R. P., Juariah, J., Susilawati, W., & Cahyana, A. (2019). Mathematical Spatial and Disposition Ability Through the Wingeom Application. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1402(7). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1402/7/077098
  19. Kenedi, A. K., Helsa, Y., Ariani, Y., Zainil, M., & Hendri, S. (2019). Mathematical connection of elementary school students to solve mathematical problems. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.1.5416.69-80
  20. Khaulah, S. (2019). Application of the CORE (Connecting, Organizing, Reflecting, Extending) Learning Model on Improving Students' Mathematical Connection Ability in Matrix Materials in Class XI SMA Negeri 3 Bireuen. Jurnal Pendidikan Almuslim, VII(1), 32–38. http://jfkip.umuslim.ac.id/index.php/jupa/article/view/421
  21. Lestari, I., & Andinny, Y. (2020). Mathematical Reasoning Ability through Metaphorical Thinking Learning Model Viewed from Mathematical Disposition. Jurnal Elemen, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v6i1.1179
  22. Lin, S.-W., & ChunTai, W. (2016). A Longitudinal Study for Types and Changes of Students' Mathematical Disposition. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(8), 1903–1911. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040821
  23. Mahmudi, A. & Saputro, B. A. (2018). Analysis of the Effect of Mathematical Disposition, Creative Thinking Ability, and Perception of Creativity on Mathematical Problem Solving Ability. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(3), 205–212. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v5i3.276
  24. Maknun, J. (2015). The Implementation of Generative Learning Model on Physics Lesson to Increase Mastery Concepts and Generic Science Skills of Vocational Students. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(6), 742–748. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-3-6-12
  25. Muhammad, M. M. S. H., & Faris, A. M. I. J. (2021). Mathematical Connections and Their Relationship to Strategic Intelligence Among Students of Mathematics Department in The Colleges of Education. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.47750/cibg.2021.27.03.271
  26. Muizaddin, R., & Santoso, B. (2016). Model Pembelajaran Core sebagai Sarana dalam Meningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal pendidikan manajemen perkantoran, 1(1), 224-232. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpm.v1i1.3470
  27. Nugraha, A. (2018). Analysis of the Mathematical Connection Ability of Junior High School Students on the Material of Two-Variable Linear Equation System (SPLDV). Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 4, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.24014/sjme.v3i2.3897
  28. Nurfitriyanti, M. (2017). Improving Mathematical Disposition Ability Through Student Activity-Based Learning. SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan), 2(1), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.30998/sap.v2i1.1726
  29. Prasetyo, T. I., Syaban, M., & Irmawan. (2018). The Effect of the Application of the Connecting, Organizing, Reflecting, Extending (CORE) Learning Model on the Improvement of High School Students' Mathematical Connection Ability. INTERMATHZO (Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika), 3(1), 11–17.
  30. Putri, S. R. & Syarifuddin, H. (2019). The Influence of Connecting, Organizing, Reflecting and Extending Learning Models on Mathematical Communication and Mathematical Disposition of Eighth Grade Students of SMPN 4 Padang. Journal of Mathematics Education and Research, 8(2), 1–6.
  31. Ramadhani, E. Y. & Kusuma, A. B. (2020). Application of CORE Learning to Improve Mathematical Connection Capabilities and Self-Efficacy. Mathematics Education Journal, 4(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.22219/mej.v4i1.11470
  32. Safitri, A., Surya, E., Syahputra, E., & Simbolon, M. (2017). Impact of Indonesian Realistic Mathematics Approach to Students Mathematical Disposition on Chapter Two Composition Function and Inverse Function in Grade XI IA-1 SMA Negeri 4 Padangsidimpuan. International Journal of Novel Research in Education and Learning, 4(2), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-6-11-5
  33. Saputra, A. N. N., Said, H. B., & Defitriani, E. (2019). Comparison of Students' Mathematical Connection Ability Through Connecting Organizing Reflecting Extending (Core) Learning Model with Conventional Learning Model in Class VIII SMP Negeri 15 Jambi City. PHI: Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(1), 12.https://doi.org/10.33087/phi.v3i1.57
  34. Saregar, A., Cahyanti, U. N., Misbah, Susilowati, N. E., Anugrah, A., & Muhammad, N. (2021). CORE Learning Model: Its Eeffectiveness Towards Students’ Creative Thinking. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20813
  35. Sari, E. P. & Karyati. (2020). The effectiveness of the CORE Learning Model in terms of Mathematical Connection Ability, Mathematical Representation, and Student Confidence. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v7i2.35487
  36. Setyaningsih, E., & Widjajanti, DB (2015). The Effectiveness of the Problem-Posing Approach in terms of Learning Achievement, Mathematical Connection Ability, and Mathematical Disposition. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v10i1.9100
  37. Siregar, N. A. R., Deniyanti, P., & Hakim, L. E. L. (2018). The Influence of Core Learning Model on Critical Thinking Ability and Mathematical Disposition Judging from the Initial Mathematics Ability of State High School Students in East Jakarta. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.30870/jppm.v11i1.2997
  38. Supianti, I. I., Zakiyah, K., & Agustian, F. (2021). E-Learning : Pencapaian Productive Disposition Berdasarkan Kemampuan Awal Matematis Siswa SMP. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 5(2), 310–325. http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v5i2.5331
  39. Trisnowali, A. & Aswina, A. (2019). The Effect of Core Learning Model (Connecting, Organizing, Reflecting and Extending) on the Learning Outcomes of Class X Students. DIDAKTIKA : Jurnal Kependidikan, 13(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.30863/didaktika.v13i1.315
  40. Triyanti, K., Jumroh & Retta, A. M. (2019). The Influence of CORE Learning Model on Mathematical Connection Ability and Student Learning Motivation. Jurnal Math-Umb.Edu, 7(November), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.36085/math-umb.edu.v7i1.486
  41. Wahyuni, R., Mariyam, M. & Kumang, V. R. A. (2019). Application of the Connecting, Organizing, Reflecting, Extending (CORE) Cooperative Learning Model to Improve Students' Mathematical Connection Ability in Cube and Block Material. Journal of Educational Review and Research, 2(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.26737/jerr.v2i1.1593
  42. Yaniawati, R. P., Kariadinata, R., Kartasasmita, B. ., & Sari, E. (2017). Accelerated Learning Method Using Edmodo to Increase Students’ Mathematical Connection and Self-Regulated Learning. International Conference on Education and Science (ICONS 2017), Icemt, 959–962. https:// doi.org/10.1145/3124116.3124128
  43. Yaniawati, R. P. (2013). E-Learning to Improve Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) of Students. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 7(2), 109. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v7i2.225
  44. Yaniawati, R. P., Indrawan, R., & Setiawan, G. (2019). Core Model on Improving Mathematical Communication and Connection, Analysis of Students' Mathematical Disposition. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 639–654. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12441a
  45. Yulianto, A. R., Rochmad, R., & Dwidayati, N. K. (2019). The Effectiveness of Core Models with Scaffolding to Improve The Mathematical Connection Skill. Journal of Primary Education, 9(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.15294 /jpe.v9i1.28236
  46. Yusron, E., Retnawati, H., & Rafi, I. (2020). How are the results of the Equalization of the national examination Package in Mathematics Subjects with Item Response Theory? Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v7i1.31221
  47. Zuyyina, H., Wijaya, T. T. Helmy, M. P., & Senjawati, E. (2018). Junior High School Students' Mathematical Connection Ability in Circle Material. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 4(2), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.30738/sosio.v4i2.2546

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.