Main Article Content

Abstract

This article discusses the results of the reading text development on the small group stage for reading activities on the school literacy movements in mathematics learning with the futsal game context, which is currently being enjoyed by the people, especially among students. This research used a design research method whose type is development studies. The evaluation flow at the prototyping stage uses the formative study flow with the stages of self-evaluation, expert review and one-to-one, small group, and field test. The research subjects were 7th-grade students in one of the junior high schools in Kabupaten Karawang. Documentation, questionnaires, and interviews are ways to collect data in this study. This study has produced the reading texts that are used for the school literacy movement program with the futsal context on practical mathematics learning.

Keywords

School Literacy Movements Futsal Design Research

Article Details

How to Cite
Effendi, K. N. S., Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., & Yaniawati, P. (2020). Reading Text for School Literacy Movement in Mathematics Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2), 145–154. Retrieved from https://jpm.ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jpm/article/view/137

References

  1. Akker, J., et al. (2006). Educational design research. London and New York: Routledge.
  2. Effendi, K. N. S., Zulkardi, Putri, R.I.I., & Yaniawati, P. (2018). The development of mathematics student worksheet for school literacy movement. Proceedings of The 6th South East Asia Design Research International Conference (SEA-DR IC) 2018 at Universitas Syiah Kuala Banda Aceh.
  3. Emzir. (2010). Qualitative research methods: Data analysis [in Bahasa]. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
  4. Kohar, A. W., Zulkardi, & Darmawijoyo. (2014). Developing PISA-like mathematics tasks to promote students’ mathematical literacy. Proceedings of The Second South East Asia Design Research International Conference (SEA-DR IC) 2014 at Universitas Sriwijaya Palembang.
  5. Lutan, R., & Sumardianto. (2000). Philosophy of Sport [in Bahasa]. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
  6. MOEC. (2018). Main design of school literacy movement [in Bahasa]. Jakarta: The Directorate of General of Secondary and Primary School: MOEC.
  7. Narti, R. A. (2012). Futsal [in Bahasa]. Bandung: PT Indahjaya Adipratama.
  8. Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. M. (2010). An introduction to educational design research. Proceedings of The Seminar Conducted at The East China Normal University Shanghai (PR China).
  9. Pusat Bahasa Depdiknas. (2008). Great dictionary of the Indonesian language [in Bahasa]. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
  10. Putri, R. I. I. (2013). Development of the learning evaluation module using constructivism learning theory. Proceedings of The 1st National Conference on Mathematics Education at PPPPTK Yogyakarta.
  11. Putri, R. I. I., Gunawan M.S., & Zulkardi. (2018). Addition of fraction in swimming context. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 943(1). http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/943/1/012035.
  12. Putri, R. I. I., & Zulkardi. (2019). Designing jumping task on percent using PMRI and collaborative learning. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 3(1), 105-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v3i1.12208.
  13. Retnaningdyah, P., Laksono, K., Mujiyem., Setyorini, N. P., Sulastri., & Hidayati, U. S. (2016). Literacy movement guidelines for secondary school [in Bahasa]. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
  14. Roni A, Zulkardi, & Putri R I I. (2017). Sprint context of asian games in the division of fractions Proceedings of The 5th South East Asia Development Research International Conference (SEA-DR IC) 2017 at Universitas Lambung Mangkurat Banjarmasin.
  15. Saputri, N. W., & Zulkardi. (2020). Development of student worksheet mathematics modelling for junior high school using the context of online ojek [in Bahasa]. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JPM), 14(1), 1-14. http://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.14.1.6825.1-14.
  16. Sarismah. (2012). Applying realistics mathematics education to improve students’ learning achievement on the triangle material in class of VII-H Secondary School Number 7 Malang [in Bahasa]. Jurnal Online Univversitas Negeri Malang, (1)3.
  17. Spangenberg, E. D. (2012). Thinking styles of mathematics and mathematical literacy learners: Implications for subject choice. Pythagoras, 33(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v33i3.179.
  18. Stacey, K. (2011). The PISA view of mathematical literacy in Indonesia. Journal on Mathematics Education (JME), 2(2). https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.2.2.746.95-126.
  19. Tessmer, M. (1993). Planning and conducting formative evaluations: Improving the quality of education and training. London: Kogan Page.
  20. Yanjin. (2018). Practicality. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0348.
  21. Zulkardi. (2006). Formative Evaluation: What, why, when, and how. Retrieved from http://www.reocities.com/zulkardi/books.html.
  22. Zulkardi, & Kohar, A. W. (2018). Designing PISA-Like mathematics tasks in Indonesia: Experiences and challenges. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012015.
  23. Zulkardi & Putri, R. I. I. (2006). Designing mathematical contextual problems [in Bahasa]. Proceedings of The 13th National Conference on Mathematics at Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.