Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 43 Download : 15

Main Article Content

Abstract

Mathematical literacy is a fundamental skill that enables students to solve real-life problems, think critically, and make informed decisions across various contexts. Its absence can impede students' academic success and limit their ability to address challenges in a technology-driven world, underscoring the importance of this research in enhancing their future opportunities. A significant factor contributing to this issue is the inadequate implementation of teaching practices that support mathematical literacy in schools. To address this challenge, this study aims to develop a valid, practical, and impactful mathematical literacy learning environment for junior high school students using educational game assistance. A design research method with a developmental research approach was employed, consisting of three stages: the preliminary stage, prototype development, and evaluation. The data were analyzed through qualitative descriptive analysis. This study developed a mathematical literacy learning environment leveraging educational game technology to enhance student learning. The environment was validated in terms of content, construct, and language aspects, deemed practical for its ease of use, accessibility, flexibility, and alignment with learning objectives, and evaluated for its potential impact based on Guskey's five-levels framework. The results highlight its potential impact on improving mathematical literacy and addressing the challenges posed by inadequate teaching practices in schools. This research underscores the importance of integrating innovative educational tools to better prepare students for success in a technology-driven world.

Keywords

Educational Games Framework Learning Environment Mathematical Literacy PISA

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Ida Hamidah, Zulkardi, Ratu Ilma Indra Putri, Surya Amami Pramuditya

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA).

How to Cite
Hamidah, I., Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., & Pramuditya, S. A. (2025). Developing a Mathematical Literacy Learning Environment for Students through Educational Game Assistance. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 19(1), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.v19i1.pp141-162
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Adipat, S., Laksana, K., Busayanon, K., Ausawasowan, A., & Adipat, B. (2021). Engaging Students in the Learning Process with Game-Based Learning: The Fundamental Concepts. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(3), 542–552. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.169
  2. Agustina, I. H., Hindersah, H., Chofyan, I., Sevillia, K. A., & Matondan, C. (2024). The suitability of Joyo Kusumo stadium park for the concept of a child-friendly city park on physical elements [In Bahasa]. Region : Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah Dan Perencanaan Partisipatif, 19(1), 162. https://doi.org/10.20961/region.v19i1.63646
  3. Ahyan, S., Zulkardi, & Darmawijoyo. (2014). Developing mathematics problems based on pisa level of change and relationships content. Journal on Mathematics Education, 5(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.5.1.1448.47-56
  4. Alt, D. (2023). Assessing the benefits of gamification in mathematics for student gameful experience and gaming motivation. Computers and Education, 200(February), 104806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104806
  5. Azzumar, F., & Rosjanuardi, R. (2024). Development of an Evaluation Tool for Mathematical Communication Based on RPG Educational Games. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 35(2015), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.55549/epess.809
  6. Bakker, A. (2018). Design research in education. In IEE Colloquium (Digest) (Issue 68). https://doi.org/10.1049/ic:19990398
  7. Bohlmann, N., & Benölken, R. (2020). Complex tasks: Potentials and pitfalls. Mathematics, 8(10), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8101780
  8. Bolstad, O. H. (2020). Secondary teachers’ operationalisation of mathematical literacy. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9551
  9. Bolstad, O. H. (2023). Lower secondary students’ encounters with mathematical literacy. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 35(1), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00386-7
  10. Dai, C. P., Ke, F., Pan, Y., & Liu, Y. (2023). Exploring students’ learning support use in digital game-based math learning: A mixed-methods approach using machine learning and multi-cases study. Computers and Education, 194(November 2022), 104698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104698
  11. Efriani, A., Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., & Aisyah, N. (2023). Developing a learning environment based on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics for pre-service teachers of early childhood teacher education. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(4), 647–662. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i4.pp647-662
  12. Fauziah, A., & Pandra, V. (2023). Developing PISA-like Mathematics Tasks in Musi Rawas Regency Contexts using Lesson Study. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 17(3), 279–296. Retrieved from https://jpm.ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jpm/article/view/149
  13. Fowler, S., Cutting, C., Fiedler, S. H. D., & Leonard, S. N. (2023). Design-based research in mathematics education: trends, challenges and potential. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 35(3), 635–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00407-5
  14. Guskey, T. R. (2002). Does it make a difference? Evaluating professional development. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 45–51. https://tguskey.com/wp-content/uploads/Professional-Learning-4-Evaluating-Professional-Development.pdf
  15. Guskey, T. R. (2016). Gauge Impact with 5 levels of Data. Journal of Standards and Development, 37(1), 32–37. www.learningforward.org
  16. Guskey, T. R. (2023). Does It Make A Difference ? Assessing Continuing Education (CR de ST Borges, Trans.; GM Moriconi, Rev. tech.). Studies in Educational Assessment, 34(2002), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18222/eae.v34.10106.
  17. Gustiningsi, T., Putri, R. I. I., & Hapizah, Z. (2024). LEPscO: Mathematical literacy learning environment for the Guru Penggerak program. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(2), 661–682. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i2.pp661-682
  18. Heng, T. T., & Song, L. (2023). At the intersection of educational change and borrowing: teachers implementing learner-centred education in Singapore. Compare, 53(2), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2021.1910014
  19. Hidayat, W., Rohaeti, E. E., Hamidah, I., & Putri, R. I. I. (2023). How can android-based trigonometry learning improve the math learning process? Frontiers in Education, 7(January), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1101161
  20. Indariani, A., Ayni, N., Pramuditya, S. A., & Noto, M. S. (2019). Mathematics Digital Book Technology and Its Potential Application in Distance Learning [in Bahasa]. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v3i1.1870
  21. Jackson, C., Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., Bush, S. B., Maiorca, C., Roberts, T., Yost, C., & Fowler, A. (2021). Equity-Oriented Conceptual Framework for K-12 STEM literacy. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00294-z
  22. Kustyarini, K., Utami, S., & Koesmijati, E. (2020). the Importance of Interactive Learning Media in a New Civilization Era. European Journal of Open Education and E-Learning Studies, 5(2), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v5i2.3298
  23. Maslihah, S., Waluya, S. B., Rochmad, Kartono, Karomah, N., & Iqbal, K. (2021). Increasing mathematical literacy ability and learning independence through problem-based learning model with realistic mathematic education approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042123
  24. Miftah, R., Herman, T., & Kurniawati, L. (2021). Students’ Thinking Process in Solving Mathematical Literacy Problem Based on Cognitive Style. Advances in Mathematics: Scientific Journal, 10(4), 1857–1869. https://doi.org/10.37418/amsj.10.4.2
  25. Musrifah, M. (2018). Wisata Religi Makam Gunung Jati Cirebon Sebagai Budaya Dan Media Spiritual. Wahana Akademika: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Sosial, 5(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.21580/wa.v5i1.2565
  26. Nortvedt, G. A., & Wiese, E. (2020). Numeracy and migrant students: a case study of secondary level mathematics education in Norway. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52(3), 527–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01143-z
  27. Nurjanah, A., Saputra, D. C., Garuda, J., & Sleman, K. (2023). Mathematical Literacy Skills : A Survey in Secondary Schools. 4(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.34312/jmathedu.v4i1.18776
  28. Nusantara, D. S., Zulkardi, & Putri, R. I. I. (2020). Designing PISA-like mathematics problem in covid-19 pandemic (PISAComat). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1657(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012057
  29. OECD. (2023a). PISA 2022 Results. In Factsheets: Vol. II. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2022-results-volume-i_53f23881-en%0Ahttps://www.oecd.org/publication/pisa-2022-results/country-notes/germany-1a2cf137/
  30. OECD. (2023b). Pisa 2025 Science Framework. May 2023, 1–93. https://pisa-framework.oecd.org/science-2025/
  31. OECD. (2023c). Program For International Student (PISA) 2022 Assessment and Analytical Framework. In OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) Publishing. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2022-assessment-and-analytical-framework_dfe0bf9c-en
  32. Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics Literacy: Are We Able To Put The Mathematics We Learm Into Everyday Use. Journal Of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 89–100. https://www.academia.edu/34467706/Mathematics_Literacy_Are_We_Able_To_Put_The_Mathematics_We_Learn_Into_Everyday_Use
  33. Phillips, R., McNaught, C., & Kennedy, G. (2010). Towards a generalised conceptual framework for learning : the Learning Environment , Learning Processes and Learning Outcomes ( LEPO ) framework. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual World Conference on Educational Multimedia Hypermedia Telecommunications Toronto Canada 28 June–2 July, 2010(July 2010), 2495–2504. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203813362-3
  34. Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2010). An introduction to educational design research. https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/14472302/Introduction_20to_20education_20design_20research.pdf
  35. Puspitarini, Y. D., & Hanif, M. (2019). Using Learning Media to Increase Learning Motivation in Elementary School. Anatolian Journal of Education, 4(2), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2019.426a
  36. Putri, R. I. I., & Zulkardi. (2020). Designing pisa-like mathematics task using. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(1), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.1.9786.135-144
  37. Rachmadtullah, R., Zulela, M. S., & Sumantri, M. S. (2018). Development of computer-based interactive multimedia: Study on learning in elementary education. International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE), 7(4), 2035–2038. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.16384
  38. Rahayu, M. S. I., & Kuswanto, H. (2021). The effectiveness of the use of the android-based carom games comic integrated to discovery learning in improving critical thinking and mathematical representation abilities. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(2), 270–283. https://doi.org/10.3926/JOTSE.1151
  39. Utami, R. P., Zulkardi, & Putri, R. I. I. (2023). Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Solving PISA-Like Questions in the Context of the Jakabaring Palembang Tourism. Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(2), 135–148. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.17.2.19371.135-148
  40. Saputra, D., Haryani, Meilinda, E., & Sidauruk, J. (2024). Rpg Based Educational Game on Basic Arithmetic Using the Mdlc Method. Journal of Engineering and Technology for Industrial Applications, 10(47), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.5935/jetia.v10i47.1112
  41. Satria, V. H., & Herumurti, D. (2021). Role-Playing Game as Learning Media To Support Online Learning. Journal of Education Technology, 5(4), 579. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i4.39718
  42. Sitopu, J. W., Khairani, M., Roza, M., Judijanto, L., & Aslan. (2024). the Importance of Integrating Mathematical Literacy in the Primary Education Curriculum : a Literature Review. Journal of Information Systems and Management (JISMA), 2(1), 121–134. http://injotel.org/index.php/12/article/view/54
  43. Susanta, A., Sumardi, H., Susanto, E., & Retnawati, H. (2023). Mathematics literacy task on number pattern using Bengkulu context for junior high school students. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i1.pp85-102
  44. Tepho, S., & Srisawasdi, N. (2023). Assessing Impact of Tablet-Based Digital Games on Mathematics Learning Performance †. Engineering Proceedings, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023038041
  45. Tessmer, M. (2019). Planning and Conducting Formative Evaluation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203061978
  46. Wibawanto, W. (2020). Game Edukasi RPG (Role Playing Game). In Lppm Unnes (Issue July). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340233496_GAME_EDUKASI_RPG_ROLE_PLAYING_GAME
  47. Winardy, G. C. B., & Septiana, E. (2023). Role, play, and games: Comparison between role-playing games and role-play in education. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 8(1), 100527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100527
  48. Yusuf, A., & Pattisahusiwa, E. (2020). Teacher’S Strategies To Create a Conducive Learning Environment in the Ron Clark Story Movie. Prosodi, 14(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.21107/prosodi.v14i2.8760
  49. Zulkardi. (2002). Developing A Learning Environment On Realistic Mathematics Education For Indonesian Student Teachers. PrintPartners Ipskamp, 1–218. https://repository.unsri.ac.id/6353/%0Ahttps://repository.unsri.ac.id/6353/1/thesis_Zulkardi.pdf
  50. Zulkardi, & Putri, R. I. I. (2020). Supporting Mathematics Teachers to Develop Jumping Task Using PISA Framework (JUMPISA). Mathematics Education Journal, 14(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.14.2.12115.199-210
  51. Zulkardi, Z., & Kohar, A. W. (2018). Designing PISA-Like Mathematics Tasks in Indonesia: Experiences and Challenges. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012015

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.