Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 39 Download : 19

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study explores how junior high school students understand different types of discounts through percent multiplication. We used the qualitative study and analyzed the in-depth answers of three of the 32 participants as research subjects. The end-of-year discount selection activity provides a daily context to build knowledge about needs and wants. Students engage with open-ended tasks requiring mathematical methods to make financial decisions. These activities help students recognize discounts in everyday life, develop problem-solving strategies, and improve mathematical skills. The article highlights how students analyze various store discounts and guide readers in distinguishing between needs and wants. Early exposure to financial math fosters responsible consumer behavior. The study emphasizes the importance of applying comprehensive information to solve financial problems by connecting mathematics to real-life scenarios. The results indicate that the implementation of an open-ended task has the potential to facilitate understanding of financial decision-making and mathematical skills.

Keywords

Discount Financial Literacy Middle School Student Open-ended Task Percentage

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Laela Sagita, Ratu Ilma Indra Putri, Zulkardi, Rully Charitas Indra Prahmana

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA).

How to Cite
Sagita, L., Ilma Indra Putri, R., Zulkardi, & Charitas Indra Prahmana, R. (2025). Choosing the Right Store: How Open-Ended Task Help Middle School Students Learn Financial Literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 19(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.v19i1.pp63-80
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Cavalcante, A., & Savard, A. (2021). Making sense of mathematics: Two case studies of financial numeracy in grade 11 mathematics classrooms. Financial Numeracy in Mathematics Education: Research and Practice, 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73588-3_9
  2. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://revistapsicologia.org/public/formato/cuali2.pdf
  3. Dituri, P., Davidson, A., & Marley-Payne, J. (2019). Combining financial education with mathematics coursework: Findings from a pilot study. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 30(2), 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1891/1052-3073.30.2.313
  4. Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
  5. Gravemeijer, K., & van Eerde, D. (2009). Design research as a means for building a knowledge base for teachers and teaching in mathematics education. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 510-524. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/596999
  6. Gong, H., Huang, J., & Goh, K. H. (2019). The illusion of double‐discount: Using reference points in promotion framing. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(3), 483–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1102
  7. Gordon-Hecker, T., Pittarello, A., Shalvi, S., & Roskes, M. (2020). Buy-one-get-one-free deals attract more attention than percentage deals. Journal of Business Research, 111, 128-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.070
  8. Kosyvas, G. (2016). Levels of arithmetic reasoning in solving an open-ended problem. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(3), 356–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1072880
  9. Lamb, J., & Booker, G. (2004). The impact of developing teacher conceptual knowledge on students’ knowledge of division. Proceedings of the 28th International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education Conference, 177–182. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED489545.pdf
  10. Lusardi, A. (2019). Financial literacy and the need for financial education: evidence and implications. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 155(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41937-019-0027-5
  11. Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2014). The economic importance of financial literacy: Theory and evidence. American Economic Journal: Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1), 5-44. https://10.1257/jel.52.1.5
  12. Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2023). The importance of financial literacy: Opening a new field. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 37(4), 137-154. https://10.1257/jep.37.4.137
  13. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  14. Moreira Costa, V., De Sá Teixeira, N. A., Cordeiro Santos, A., & Santos, E. (2021). When more is less in financial decision-making: Financial literacy magnifies framing effects. Psychological Research, 85(5), 2036-2046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01372-7
  15. Nieminen, J. H., Chan, M. C. E., & Clarke, D. (2022). What affordances do open-ended real-life tasks offer for sharing student agency in collaborative problem-solving?. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(1), 115-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10074-9
  16. Nusantara, T., & Susanto, H. (2016). The students decision making in solving discount problem. International Education Studies, 9(7), 57-63. https://10.5539/ies.v9n7p57
  17. OECD (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/b25efab8-en.pdf?expires=1718694908&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=4583C94C0725F7B78807D944A5020591
  18. OECD (2024). PISA 2022 Results (Volume IV): How Financially Smart Are Students?, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5a849c2a-en.
  19. Prayitno, S. B. (2023). Analysis of the perception of free shipping promotions on purchasing decisions on the shopee marketplace. Journal of Management Science (JMAS), 6(2), 199-205. https://doi.org/10.35335/jmas.v6i2.230
  20. Sagita, L., Putri, R. I. I., Zulkardi, & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2023a). Promising research studies between mathematics literacy and financial literacy through project-based learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 13(4), 753–772. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v13i4.pp753-772
  21. Sagita, L., Putri, R. I. I., Zulkardi, Z., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2023b). Basic arithmetic on financial literacy skills: A new learning outcome. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 8(1). https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v8i1.1252
  22. Sawatzki, C. (2017). Lessons in financial literacy task design: Authentic, imaginable, useful. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 29(1), 25-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-016-0184-0
  23. Sawatzki, C., Zmood, S., & Davidson, A. (2020). Using financial modelling to decide" Should I tap into my superannuation?". Australian Mathematics Education Journal, 2(2), 22-27. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/INFORMIT.287245903542863
  24. Sawatzki, C., & Goos, M. (2018). Cost, price and profit: what influences students’ decisions about fundraising?. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 30(4), 525-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-0241-y
  25. Sawatzki, C., & Sullivan, P. (2018). Shopping for shoes: Teaching students to apply and interpret mathematics in the real world. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16, 1355-1373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9833-3
  26. Savard, A. (2022a). Navigating in a Complex World Using Mathematics: The Role Played by Financial Numeracy. In: Michelsen, C., Beckmann, A., Freiman, V., Jankvist, U.T., Savard, A. (Eds) Mathematics and Its Connections to the Arts and Sciences (MACAS). Mathematics Education in the Digital Era, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10518-0_14
  27. Savard, A. (2022b). What did they have to say about money and finance? Grade 4 students’ representations about financial concepts when learning mathematics. Education 3-13, 50(3), 316–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2020.1850826
  28. Savard, A., & Polotskaia, E. (2017). Who’s wrong? Tasks fostering understanding of mathematical relationships in word problems in elementary students. ZDM, 49(6), 823–833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0865-5
  29. Setianingsih, R., Sa’dijah, C., As’ari, A. R., & Muksar, M. (2017). Investigating fifth-grade students’ construction of mathematical knowledge through classroom discussion. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/619
  30. Thomas, P., & Chrystal, A. (2013). Explaining the “buy one get one free” promotion: the golden ratio as a marketing tool. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 3(08), 655-673. https://10.4236/ajibm.2013.38075
  31. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Drijvers, P. (2020). Realistic Mathematics Education. In: Lerman, S. (Eds), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_170

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.