Article Sidebar

E-LKPD
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 27 Download : 18

Main Article Content

Abstract

Mathematical thinking involves how individuals present, understand, and critically examine mathematical truths, considering how their relation to representation or imagination. However, students often exhibit low mathematical thinking skills. Previous research shows that digital worksheets based on creative problem-solving can foster these skills, yet the relationship between mathematical thinking and learning styles remains unexplored. This study aims to develop innovative digital worksheets based on creative problem solving, categorized as valid, practical, and effective in enhancing students' mathematical thinking with audio-visual learning styles. The study employs a development method comprising two main stages: a preliminary study (analysis and design) and a formative study (evaluation and revision). Data collection instruments include tests, observations, validation sheets, questionnaires, and interviews. The analysis integrates both quantitative and qualitative approaches. The study involved 15 audio-visual learners from 24 eighth-grade students at SMP Srijaya Negara Palembang. The results indicate that students excel in specializing and identifying problems based on given information. Their generalizing skills, including finding patterns and relationships are strong. However, their conjecturing and convincing skills require improvement, particularly in making connections and reasoning. The digital worksheets were deemed 93% valid and practical, significantly enhancing students' mathematical thinking, particularly for those with an audio-visual learning style. While students demonstrated excellent skills in specialization and good skills in generalization, there is still a need for improvement in conjecturing and convincing due to errors in mathematical reasoning.

Keywords

Audio-Visual Creative Problem Solving Digital-Worksheets Formative Study Mathematical Thinking

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Ely Susanti, Trisna Wulandari, Hapizah, Indaryanti, Isrok’atun, Ruth Helen Simarmata

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA).

How to Cite
Susanti, E., Wulandari, T., Hapizah, Indaryanti, Isrok’atun, & Simarmata, R. H. (2025). Digital-Worksheets Based Creative Problem Solving to Support Students Mathematical Thinking for Audio-Visual Students. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 19(1), 23–46. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.v19i1.pp23-46
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aisyah, N., & Solfitri, T. (2022). Development of Electronic Student Worksheets Based on the Discovery Learning Model to Facilitate Mathematical Understanding Ability of Class XI SMA / MA Students in Limit Function Material. Journal of Research on Mathematics Instruction, 3(2), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.33578/jrmi.v3i2.70
  2. Alkhasawneh, E., (2018). Learning Styles in Mathematics: A Comprehensive Review. Educational Research Review. http://doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2018.03.002
  3. Ariastuti, M. D., & Wahyudin, A. Y. (2022). Exploring Academic Performance and Learning Style of Undergraduate Students in English Education Program. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.33365/jeltl.v3i1.1817
  4. Bosman, A., & Schulze, S. (2018). Learning style preferences and Mathematics achievement of secondary school learners. South African Journal of Education, 38(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v38n1a1440
  5. Çelik, H. C., & Özdemir, F. (2020). Mathematical Thinking as a Predictor of Critical Thinking Dispositions of Pre- service Mathematics Teachers Mathematical Thinking as a Predictor of Critical Thinking Dispositions of Pre-service Mathematics Teachers. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.268.6
  6. Chofifah, N., & Wintarti, A. (2023). Development of Student Worksheets Electronic (E-LKPD) for Geometry Transformation Materials Nor. MATHEdunesa, 12(1), 92–107. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v12n1.p92-107
  7. Devlin, K. (2021). Teaching mathematics as a way of thinking – not calculating. Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri. Estonian Journal of Education, 9(9), 33–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/eha.2021.9.1.02b
  8. Dewi, F. K., Nuraida, E. M., & Ramli, M. N. (2022). Mathematical Communication of Students Who Have Auditorial Learning Styles in Solving Rectangular Problems. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogic Studies (JCPS), 1(2), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.30631/jcps.v1i2.1633
  9. Fajari, L. E. W., Sarwanto, & Chumdari. (2020). Improving elementary school’s critical thinking skills through three different PBL-assisted learning media viewed from learning styles. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 16(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135193
  10. Fauzi, I., Rakhmat, C., Budiman, N., & Indonesia, U. P. (2023). Complex Thinking: How are Students’ Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills in Elementary School? Bulletin of Science Education, 3(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.51278/bse.v3i3.916
  11. Firman, L. A., Handayani, A. D., Katminingsih, Y., & Widodo, S. (2024). Students’ Thinking Process in Solving Math Problems in Terms of Learning Style. International Journal of Researcj and Review, 11(5), 224–236. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20240527
  12. Firmansyah, M. A., & Syarifah, L. L. (2023). Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability In View Of Learning Styles. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 58-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/prima.v7i1.7217
  13. Goos, M. (2019). Understanding and promoting students ’ mathematical thinking : a review of research published in ESM. Educational Studies in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09921-7
  14. Hadi, I., Subarinah, S., Triutami, T. W., & Hikmah, N. (2022). Analysis of mathematical reasoning errors in solving number pattern problems viewed from learning styles. Journal of Mathematics Education and Application, 2(3), 612. https://mathjournal.unram.ac.id/index.php/Griya/indexGriya
  15. Harahap, Z. H. (2021). The Effects of Visual and Auditory Learning Styles on Students ’ Learning Outcomes in Historical Social Studies. International Journal of Research and Review, 8(January), 72–76. https://www.ijrrjournal.com/IJRR_Vol.8_Issue.1_Jan2021/IJRR-Abstract09.html
  16. Ica, E. E., Kusuma, A. W., & Utama, E. G. (2024). Analysis of Creative Thinking Ability in View of Learning Style in Class IV Elementary School Science Learning. Journal Of Educational Review And Research, 7(2), 13–24. https://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jerr.v7i1.5493
  17. Irawati, I., Ilhamdi, M. L., & Nasruddin, N. (2021). The Influence of Learning Styles on Science Learning Outcomes. Pijar Mipa Journal, 16(1), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v16i1.2202
  18. Ishartono, N., Faiziyah, N., Sutarni, S., Putri, A. B., Fatmasari, L. W., Sayuti, M., ... & Yunus, M. M. (2021). Visual, Auditory, and Kinesthetic Students: How They Solve PISA-Oriented Mathematics Problems? In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1720, No. 1, p. 012012). IOP Publishing. 10.1088/1742-6596/1720/1/012012.
  19. Iswari, I. F., Susanti, E., Hapizah, H., Meryansumayeka, M., & Turidho, A. (2019). Design of problem-solving questions to measure mathematical thinking type abstraction. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1318(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012104
  20. Jawad, L. F., & Majeed, B. H. (2021). The Impact of CATs on Mathematical Thinking and Logical Thinking Among Four-Class Scientific Students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET, 16(10). http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i10.22515
  21. Juliana, N., Ampera, D., & Sinukaban, V. Y. (2024). Digital Student Worksheets to Improving Students ’ Learning Independence. Journal of Education Technology, 8(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v8i1.75433
  22. Khalil, M., & Ul-Haq, Z.-. (2019). Concept Process with Mathematical Thinking Tools under the Domain of Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development. Journal of Contemporary Teacher Education, 3, 1–12. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Concept-Process-with-Mathematical-Thinking-Tools-of-Khalil/
  23. Laine, C. E., Mahmud, M. S., Laine, C. E., & Mahmud, M. S. (2022). The Influence of Problem-Based Learning ( PBL ) on Mathematics Learning : Systematic Literature Review The Influence of Problem-Based Learning ( PBL ) on Mathematics Learning : Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 1(3), 1120–1137. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i3/15033
  24. Ma, V. J., & Ma, X. (2014). A comparative analysis of the relationship between learning styles and mathematics performance. International Journal of STEM Education, 1(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-7822-1-3
  25. Malacapay, M. C. (2019). Differentiated Instruction in Relation to Pupils ’ Learning Style. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 625–638. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12440a
  26. Mattoliang, L. A., Ta’a2, R. I., Nursalam, Sriyanti, A., & Suharti. (2024). Analysis Of Mathematical Problem Solving Ability Of Class X Students Reviewed From Learning Style. MaPan : Jurnal Matematika Dan Pembelajaran, 12(1), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2024v12n1a12
  27. Mustafa, S., & Sari, V. (2019). The Implementation of Mathematical Problem-Based Learning Model as an Effort to Understand the High School Students ’ Mathematical Thinking Ability. International Education Studies, 12, 117–123. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n2p117
  28. Nasir, M. (2023). Student Representation of Mathematical Thinking in Mathematical Problem-Solving. Journal of Medives : Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang, 7(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.31331/medivesveteran.v7i1.2241
  29. Nieveen, N., & Folmer, E. (2013). Educational Design Research Educational Design Research. Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development: SLO, 1–206. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno=EJ815766
  30. Oljayevna, O., & Shavkatovna, S. (2020). The development of logical thinking of primary school students in mathematics. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 8(2), 235-239. https://www.idpublications.org/
  31. Pambudi, D. S., Budayasa, I. K., & Lukito, A. (2020). The role of mathematical connections in mathematical problem-solving. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2), 129-144. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.14.2.10985.129-144
  32. Partika, H., Syaiful, & Syamsurizal. (2024). Effect of Implementing Differentiated Learning Based on Learning Style on Abilities in Mathematical. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 50(8), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i81518
  33. Pourdavood, R., McCarthy, K., & McCafferty, T. (2020). The Impact of Mental Computation on Children's Mathematical Communication, Problem Solving, Reasoning, and Algebraic Thinking. Athens journal of Education, 7(3), 241-253. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.7-3-1
  34. Putu, N., Elviani, Y., & Sudatha, G. W. (2023). ICT Digital Teaching Module on the Preparation of Interactive Student Worksheets. Jurnal Mimbar Ilmu, 28(2), 246–254.https://doi.org/10.23887/mi.v28i2.61539
  35. Rogowsky, B. A., Calhoun, B. M., Tallal, P., & Fawcett, A. J. (2020). Providing Instruction Based on Students ’ Learning Style Preferences Does Not Improve Learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(February). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00164
  36. Santosa, A., & Huda, N. (2023). Analysis of Mathematics Problem Solving Ability Students Based on Mathematical Resilience and Gender. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies Volume, 46(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJESS/2023/v46i41007
  37. Sari, R., Susanti, E., Kurniadi, E., & Sari, N. (2022). Students ’ Ability in Making Mathematics Generalizations Through Geogebra Assisted CPS on Straight Line Equations. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 656(January). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220403.023
  38. Sharma, P. (2021). Importance and Application of Mathematics in Everyday Life. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET), 9(XI). 10.22214/ijraset.2021.38869
  39. Shatri, K., & Shala, L. (2022). Evaluating the Effect of Interactive Digital Presentations on Students ’ Performance during Technology Class. Hindawi Education Research International, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3337313
  40. Shirvani, H. (2016). The Relationship between Student Mathematics Scores and Learning Styles. International Journal of Science, Mathematics & Technology Learning, 23(4). 10.37640/ice.02.663
  41. Sinuraya, R. G., & Frisnoiry, S. (2023). Development of Problem Based Learning (PBL) Electronic Student Worksheets (E-LKPD) to Improve Students' Mathematical Problem Solving Ability. Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(1), 107-124. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjmr.v2i1.2690
  42. Subekti, M. A. S., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2021). Developing Interactive Electronic Student Worksheets through Discovery Learning and Critical Learning during Pandemic Era. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 13(2), 137–176. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1383140.pdf
  43. Sulisawati, D. N., Murtinasari, F., & Sukma, L. (2019). Differences of Visual , Auditorial , Kinesthetic Students in Understanding Mathematics Problems. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML), 2(2), 45–51.https://doi.org/10.29103/mjml.v2i2.1385
  44. Sulistiyarini, D. (2016). The Influence Of Motivation , Learning Styles , Teacher Leadership , And Teaching Intensity On Students ’ Leaning Outcomes. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 23, 136–143.https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v23i2.12296
  45. Susandi, A. D., & Khoiriyah, B. (2024). Evaluating the M6 learning model and realistic mathematics education ( RME ) approach in enhancing critical thinking skills in mathematics : A focus on students ’ logical-mathematical intelligence. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 15(02), 413–430. https://dx.doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v15i2.22973
  46. Susanti, E., Hapizah, Meryansumayeka, M., & Irenika, I. (2019). Mathematical thinking of 13 years old students through problem-solving Mathematical thinking of 13 years old students through. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1318(012103). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012103
  47. Syaiful, & Puspayanti. (2023). Problem-Solving Models Using Procedural Knowledge in Solving Mathematics Problems of Junior High School Students. European Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 4(2), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmse.4.2.95
  48. Uno, H. B., & Umar, M. K. (2023). Managing intelligence in learning: a concept of intelligence-based learning. Bumi Aksara.
  49. Utaminingsih, S., Amalia, I., & Sumaji, S. (2024). Management of Mathematics Learning Based on Interactive Digital Worksheets to Improve Students ’ Critical Thinking Ability. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 13(1), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v13n1p159
  50. Widayanti, Abdurrahman, A., & Suyatna, A. (2019). Future Physics Learning Materials Based on STEM Education: Analysis of Teachers and Students Perceptions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012021
  51. Wijns, N., De Smedt, B., Erschaffel, L., & Torbeyns, J. (2019). Are Preschoolers who spontaneously create patterns better ini mathematics? The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3). https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/bjep.12329

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.