Article Sidebar

Download
Statistic
Read Counter : 7

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to develop a learning trajectory for ratio material using rice fertilization context. This study employed validation studies within a design research framework involving seventh-grade students at a junior high school in Belitang. Data was collected through student activity sheets, observations, and interviews. Design research consists of three stages: experimental preparation, experimental design, and retrospective analysis. The findings indicate that the learning trajectory for ratio material in the rice fertilization context includes identifying patterns and relationships between two quantities, determining the simplest unit ratios, representing ratios using ratios table, and solving real-world ratio-related problems. These results confirm that the designed learning trajectory serves as a practical reference for teachers in designing ratio learning that is meaningful, applicable, and relevant to the life experiences of students in agricultural areas, while supporting sustainable agriculture.

Keywords

Learning Trajectory PMRI Ratio Sustainable Practices Sustainable Agriculture

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Filian Yunita Sari, Zulkardi Zulkardi, Ratu Ilma Indra Putri, Ely Susanti

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA).

How to Cite
Sari, F. Y., Zulkardi, Z., Putri, R. I. I., & Susanti, E. (2025). Ratios in Agriculture: A Rice Fertilization Context for Ratio Learning Trajectory . Mathematics Education Journal, 19(3), 509–526. Retrieved from https://jpm.ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jpm/article/view/210
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Akker, J. V., & Gravemeijer, K. (2010). Introducing Educational Design Research. In Educational Design Research. (3rd ed.). Netzodruk, Enschede. https://research.utwente.nl/files/14472302/Introduction_20to_20education_20design_20research.pdf
  2. Andini, W., & Jupri, A. (2017). Student obstacles in ratio and proportion learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812(1). https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012048
  3. Benson-O’Connor, C. D., McDaniel, C., & Carr, J. (2019). Bringing math to life: provide students opportunities to connect their lives to math. Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.4148/2470-6353.1299
  4. Bustang, Zulkardi, Darmawijoyo, Dolk, M., & van Eerde, D. (2013). Developing a local instruction theory for learning the concept of angle through visual field activities and spatial representations. International Education Studies, 6(8), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n8p58
  5. Chaim, B. D., Keret, Y., & Ilany, B.-S. (2012). Ratio and Proportion Research and Teaching in Mathematics Teachers’ Education (Pre- and In-Service Mathematics Teachers of Elementary and Middle School Classes). In Springer eBooks: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-784-4
  6. Civak, A. R., Işıksal Bostan, M., & Yemen Karpuzcu, S. (2022). Development of a hypothetical learning trajectory for enhancing proportional reasoning. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 37(1), 345–365. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2020063485
  7. Diba, D. M. S., & Prabawanto, S. (2019). The analysis of students’ answers in solving ratio and proportion problems. International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032114
  8. Dougherty, B., Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., & Shin, M. (2017). Helping students with mathematics difficulties understand ratios and proportions. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 49(2). https://exceptionalchildren.org/journal/helping-students-mathematics-difficulties-understand-ratios-and-proportions
  9. Fauziah, A., Putri, R. I. I., & Zulkardi. (2022). Collaborative learning through lesson study in PMRI training for primary school pre-service teacher: the simulation of polygon matter. Infinity Journal, 11(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v11i1.p1-16
  10. Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design Research from A Learning Design Perspective Dalam Jvd. Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. Mckenney, & N. Nieveen (Editor), Educational Design Research (17-51). Routledge Taylor and Francis Group 4. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203088364
  11. Gunawan, W., & Hadi, S. (2024). The effect of a realistic mathematics education (RME) approach and reasoning ability on students’ conceptual and procedural understanding. Contemporary Educational Researches Journal, 14(2), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.18844/cerj.v14i2.9318
  12. Hodgen, J., Foster, C., Brown, M., & Martin, D. (2024). Low-attaining secondary school mathematics students’ perspectives on recommended teaching strategies. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 22(6), 1325–1343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10420-8
  13. Lamon, S. (2020). Teaching Fractions and Ratios For Understanding. in Teaching Fractions and Ratios for Understanding (4th ed.). In Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003008057
  14. Lestari, P., Nurhasanah, F., Ayryuna, D., Chrisnawati, H. E., Kurniawati, I., Kuswardi, Y., & Wulandari, A. N. (2019). Proportional reasoning and belief of pre-service mathematics teachers: The use of modified Authentic Investigation Activities (AIA) model. AIP Conference Proceedings. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article/2194/1/020056/819515/Proportional-reasoning-and-belief-of-pre-service
  15. Muttaqin, H., Putri, R. I. I., & Somakim. (2017). Design research on ratio and proportion learning by using ratio table and graph with OKU Timur context at the 7 th grade. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(2), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.8.2.3969.211-222
  16. Nofriati, N. F., Hartono, Y., & Somakim, S. (2020). Learning direct and inverse proportion using musi tour. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 3(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v3i2.13578
  17. Petit, M. M., Laird, R. E., Wyneken, M. F., Huntoon, F. R., Abele-Austin, M. D., & Sequeira, J. D. (2020). A Focus on Ratios and Proportions. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429353611
  18. Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2013). Educational Design Research. Educational Design Research, July, 1–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_11
  19. Rawani, D., Putri, R. I. I., Zulkardi, & Susanti, E. (2023). RME-based local instructional theory for translation and reflection using of South Sumatra dance context. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(3), 545–562. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i3.pp545-562
  20. Samura, A. O., Im, R., & Ruslan, J. (2024). Local instruction theory in the realistic mathematics education approach to improve students’ mathematical proficiency in linear equation topics. Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 17(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.20414/betajtm.v17i1.624
  21. Sari, F. Y., Ilma, R., Putri, I., & Susanti, E. (2025). How do junior high school students solve proportional reasoning problems ? Jurnal Elemen, 11(2), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v11i2.27922
  22. Sari, F. Y., Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., Susanti, E., & Nusantara, D. S. (2024). Ratio material learning design using the context of cooking rice to help elementary students understand concepts. Inomatika, 6(1), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.35438/inomatika.v6i1.443
  23. Setyaningsih, N., Juniati, D., & Suwarsono. (2018). Student ’ s scheme in solving mathematics problems. International Conference on Mathematics: Pure, Applied and Computation. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/974/1/012012
  24. Sumarto, Zulkardi, Darmawijoyo, & van Galen, F. (2013). Ratio table and money context as means to support the development of student’s proportional reasoning. The First South East Asia Design/ Development Research (SEA-DR) International Conference, 427–435. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://repository.unsri.ac.id/5980/1/P49_Syl_435.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi58cSc_NyNAxXGS3ADHQ8qGxYQFnoECBgQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0kjz55aITijRASff7KK_2R
  25. Tamur, M., Kurnila, V. S., Jehadus, E., Nurjaman, A., Mandur, K., & Ndiung, S. (2021). The effect of the realistic mathematics education approach: meta-analysis of the measured mathematical ability angle. Atlantis Press. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icmmed-20/125956432
  26. UNESCO. (2024). Education for Sustainable Development: Learning to Act for Sustainability. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386934
  27. Utari, R. S., Putri, R. I. I., & Hartono, Y. (2015). Supporting 7 th students’ proportional reasoning using Palembang culture as context and ratio table as model. The Third South East Asia Design/Development Research International Conference, 344–352. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://repository.unsri.ac.id/id/eprint/6841/contents&ved=2ahUKEwio0Oeu-9yNAxUKUGcHHRAHPVMQFnoECBkQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3Xzw1YAMyPvKMAMu_3ei16
  28. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Drijvers, P. (2014). Realistic Mathematics Education. In Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (In S. Lerm). Springer. https://webspace.science.uu.nl/~heuve108/BEWAAR/download-velle/rme/VdHeuvel-Drijvers_2014_ENCYCLOPEDIA_RME-ref_OCR.pdf
  29. Wahyuni, I. (2022). Proportional Reasoning. Bantul: Lembaga Ladang Kata. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://digilib.uinkhas.ac.id/20495/1/PENALARAN%2520PROPORSIONAL%2520%252B%2520SAMPUL.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi6o_CHp9uNAxW2RWcHHeHnM-UQFnoECBcQAQ&usg=AOvVaw1G8HOO2RZTHuOZSeJk58hH
  30. Wahyuningrum, A. S., Suryadi, D., & Turmudi, T. (2022). Students’ prior knowledge as an ontogenic obstacle on the topic of ratio and proportion. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 17(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.17.1.18866.55-68
  31. Walle, V. de. (2008). Elementary and Secondary School Mathematics: Teaching Development. Jakarta: Erlangga. https://opac.umuslim.ac.id/index.php?subject=%22MATEMATIKA+SEKOLAH+DASAR+DAN+MENENGAH%22&search=Search
  32. Wijaya, A. P., Yunarti, T., & Coesamin, M. (2019). The analyzing of students’ learning obstacles in understanding proportion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/4/042022
  33. Zulfah, E., Fauzan, A., & Made Arnawa, I. (2024). Development of local instructional theory on parallelogram topics based on rme to improve mathematical problem-solving skills. Journal of World Science, 3(3), 391–397. https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v3i3.582
  34. Zulkardi, & Putri, R. I. I. (2019). New School Mathematics Curricula, PISA and PMRI in Indonesia. In School Mathematics Curricula: Asian Perspectives and Glimpses of Reform (In C. P. V, pp. 39–49). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6312-2_3
  35. Zulkardi, & Putri, R. I. I. (2020). Supporting mathematics teachers to develop jumping task using PISA framework (JUMPISA). Mathematics Education Journal, 14(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.14.2.12115.199-210
  36. Zulkardi, Z., Putri, R. I. I., & Wijaya, A. (2020). Two Decades of Realistic Mathematics Education in Indonesia. In International Reflections on the Netherlands Didactics of Mathematics. ICME-13 Monographs (In M. van, pp. 325–340). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20223-1_18

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.