Article Sidebar

Article 08
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 17 Download : 4

Main Article Content

Abstract

The addition and subtraction of fractions are considered one of the most difficult topics in mathematics for students. However, interventions to improve student performance in this direction are not widespread. This action research study investigated the effectiveness of synchronous videoconference intervention in improving student performance in addition and subtraction of fractions. It also explored the perceptions of students about synchronous e-learning sessions. A total of 51 Year 7 students conveniently sampled from a government school in Brunei Darussalam served as participants for this study. The action taken included a pre-test, a videoconference lesson intervention, a post-test, survey, and interviews. The paired sample t-test revealed a significant difference in test scores t(50) = -3.50, p<0.001, with post-test scores (Mean = 8.47, SD = 1.78) higher than the pre-test scores (Mean = 7.1, SD = 3.10). These findings suggest that student performance improved after the videoconferencing intervention. The results of the survey and interviews revealed that the students had a positive perception of the videoconference lessons. They described the lessons as pleasant, collaborative, and convenient. However, they reported challenges, such as unstable internet connection, distractions, and inadequate teacher supervision. Despite these challenges, they equally preferred videoconferencing and traditional face-to-face lessons. This study concluded that videoconferencing could be a useful tool in teaching and learning fractions. It has the potential in improving student-centered teaching and learning, especially when the challenges that come with its use are controlled.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.16.1.17027.103-120

Keywords

Addition and Subtraction Academic Performance Fractions Brunei Darussalam Synchronous Videoconferencing

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Irfan Japar, Daniel Asamoah, Masitah Shahrill

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA).

How to Cite
Japar, I., Asamoah, D., & Shahrill, M. (2024). Addressing Student Learning Gaps in Fractions: How Effective is Synchronous Videoconferencing?. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 16(1), 103–120. Retrieved from https://jpm.ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jpm/article/view/164
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abbas, N. H., Shahrill, M., & Indra P. R. C. (2020). Understanding primary school children’s learning on addition of fractions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1613(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1613/1/012046
  2. Abdul, L. S. N. (2021). Standardised testing and students’ wellbeing: A global or local problem? In P. Le Ha, A. Kumpoh, K. Wood, R. Jawawi & Said, H (Eds.), Globalisation, education, and reform in Brunei Darussalam (pp. 197-215), Palgrave Macmillan
  3. Asamoah, D., Shahrill, M., & Abdul Latif, S. (2022). A review of formative assessment techniques in higher education during COVID-19. The Qualitative Report, 27(2), 475-487. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5145
  4. Bailey, D. H., Zhou, X., Zhang, Y., Cui, J., Fuchs, L. S., Jordan, N. C., Gersten, R., & Siegler, R. S. (2015). Development of fraction concepts and procedures in U.S. and Chinese children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 129, 68-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.08.006
  5. Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243-1289. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309333844
  6. Bruce, C. D., & Ross, J. (2009). Conditions for effective use of interactive on-line learning objects: The case of a fractions computer-based learning sequence. The Electronic Journal of Mathematics and Technology, 3, 3-5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228361395
  7. Bruce, C., Chang, D., Flynn, T., & Yearley, S. (2013). Foundations to learning and teaching fractions: Addition and subtraction. Curriculum and Assessment Branch, Ontario. Retrieved from http://www.edugains.ca
  8. Chiasson, K., Terras, K., & Smart, K. (2015). Faculty perceptions of moving a face-to-face course to online instruction. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 12(4), 231-240. Available at https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1067275.pdf
  9. Chong, W. W. N., Shahrill, M., Asamoah, D., & Latif, S. N. A. (2022). Non-digital card game and year 8 students’ performance in integers. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 2(1), em007. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/11928
  10. Cicha, K., Rizun, M., Rutecka, P., & Strzelecki, A. (2021). COVID-19 and higher education: First- year students’ expectations toward distance learning. Sustainability, 13(4), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041889
  11. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge Academic
  12. Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H., & Trevino, L. K. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: implications for information systems. Management Information System Quarterly, 11(3), 355- 366. https://doi.org/10.2307/248682
  13. Denscombe, M. (2010). The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects (4th ed). Open University Press
  14. Doggett, A. M. (2008). The videoconferencing classroom: What do students think? Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 44(4), 29-41. http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/arch_mfg_fac_pub/3
  15. Fazio, L., & Siegler, R. S. (2011). Teaching fractions. International Academy of Education
  16. Fortune, M. F., Spielman, M., Pangelinan, D. T. (2011). Students’ perception of online or face-to-face learning and social media in hospitality, recreation and tourism. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 1-16. Available at https://jolt.merlot.org/vol7no1/fortune_0311.pdf
  17. Francescucci, A., & Rohani, L. (2019). Exclusively synchronous online (VIRI) learning: The impact on student performance and engagement outcomes. Journal of Marketing Education, 41(1), 60- 69. https://doi.org/10.1177/02734 75318 818864
  18. Finti, H. N. F. M. M., Shahrill, M., & Salleh, S. M. (2016). Integrating virtual manipulative with the use of iPad in the teaching and learning of fractions. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 8(4), 581-601. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2016.08.036
  19. Goswami, R. (2018). Misconceptions in fraction. At Right Anglesa, 7(1), 48-51
  20. Hamid, M. H. S., Shahrill, M., Rohani M., Mahalle, S., & Mundia, L. (2013). Barriers to mathematics achievement in Brunei secondary school students: insights into the roles of mathematics anxiety, self-esteem, proactive coping, and test stress. International Education Studies 6(11), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n11p1
  21. Hansen, N., Jordan, N. C., & Rodrigues, J. (2017). Identifying learning difficulties with fractions: A longitudinal study of student growth from third through sixth grade. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 50, 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.11.002
  22. Idris, N., & Narayanan, L. M. (2011). Error patterns in addition and subtraction of fractions among form two students. Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(2), 35-54. Available at https://educationforatoz.com/images/Idris.pdf
  23. Jamil, H., Ramli, H. M., & Leong, E. (2021). Advocating blended learning for university undergraduate level mathematical instruction beyond Covid-19. In S. A. Abdul Karim, & S. A. Husain (Eds.), Engineering and sciences teaching and learning activities. Studies in systems, decision and control (pp. 33-45). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79614- 3_4
  24. Kamii, C., Lewis, B. A., & Kirkland, L. D. (2001). Fluency in subtraction compared with addition. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20(1), 33-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732- 3123(01)00060-8
  25. Keengwe, K., & Kidd, T. T. (2010). Towards best practices in online learning and teaching in higher education. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 533-541. Available at https://jolt.merlot.org/vol6no2/keengwe_0610.htm
  26. Khalid, M. (2007). Incorporating mathematical thinking in addition and subtraction of fraction: real issues and challenges. Progress report of the APEC-Khoen Kean international symposium. Available at https://www.crme.kku.ac.th/APEC/PDF%202007/Madihah%20Khalid.pdf
  27. Laidin, D. R., & Tengah, K. A. (2021). Applying butterfly method in the learning of addition and subtraction of fractions. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 15(2), 161-174. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.15.2.13934.161-174
  28. Lin, X., & Gao, L. (2020). Students' sense of community and perspective of taking synchronous and asynchronous online courses. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 169-179. http://www.asianjde.org/ojs/index.php/Asian JDE/article/view/448
  29. Lortie-Forgues, H., Tian, J., & Siegler, R. S. (2015). Why is learning fraction and decimal arithmetic so difficult? Developmental Review, 38, 201-221. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2015.07.008
  30. Low, J., Shahrill, M., & Zakir, N. (2020). Solving fractions by applying the bar model concept with the butterfly method. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2), 101-116. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.14.2.11261.101-116
  31. Matzin, R., Shahrill, M., Mahalle, S., Hamid, M. H. S., & Mundia, L. (2013). A comparison of learning styles and study strategies scores of Brunei secondary school students by test anxiety, success attributions, and failure attributions: Implications for teaching at-risk and vulnerable students. Review of European Studies, 5(5), 119-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/res.v5n5p119
  32. Miller, S. P., & Hudson, P. J. (2007). Using evidence-based practices to build mathematics competence related to conceptual, procedural, and declarative knowledge. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(1), 49-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00230.x
  33. Ni, A. Y. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of classroom and online learning: teaching research methods. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 19(2), 200-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2013.12001730
  34. Olson, G., & Olson, J. (2003). Mitigating the effects of distance on collaborative intellectual work.
  35. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 33-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590303117
  36. Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival Manual. Open University Press
  37. Racheva, V. (2018). Social aspects of synchronous virtual learning environments. AIP Conference Proceedings 2048, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5082050
  38. Rahmawati, M. S., & Soekarta, R. (2021). Social Media-Based E-learning and Online Assignments on Algebraic Materials. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 15(2), 175-190. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.15.2.13714.175-190
  39. Rosli, S., Shahrill, M., & Yusof, J. (2020). Applying the hybrid strategy in solving mathematical word problems at the elementary school level. Journal of Technology and Science Education 10(2), 216-230. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.965
  40. Salam, N. H. A., & Shahrill, M. (2014). Examining classroom interactions in secondary mathematics classrooms in Brunei Darussalam. Asian Social Science 10(11), 92-103. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n11p92
  41. Sarwadi, H. R. H., & Shahrill, M. (2014). Understanding students’ mathematical errors and misconceptions: The case of year 11 repeating students. Mathematics Education Trends and Research, 2014, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5899/2014/metr-00051
  42. Schultz, R. (2003). The effectiveness of online synchronous discussion. Informing Science
  43. Shahrill, M. (2018). Teachers’ devotion to review lessons: insights to the mathematics lessons in Brunei Darussalam. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1028(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012158
  44. Shahrill, M., Petra, M. I., Naing, L., Yacob, J., Santos, J. H., & Abdul Aziz, A. B. Z. (2021a). New norms and opportunities from the COVID-19 pandemic crisis in a higher education setting: Perspectives from Universiti Brunei Darussalam. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(3), 700-712. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-07-2020-0347
  45. Shahrill, M., Noorashid, N., & Keasberry, C. (2021b). COVID-19: Educational practices and responses in Brunei Darussalam. In L. H. Phan, A. Kumpoh, K. Wood, R. Jawawi & H. Said (Eds.), Globalisation, education, and reform in Brunei Darussalam (pp. 325-354). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77119-5_16
  46. Simpol, N. S. H., Shahrill, M., Li, H-C, & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2018). Implementing thinking aloud pair and Pólya problem solving strategies in fractions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 943(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/943/1/012013
  47. Suffolk, J., & Clements, M. A. (2003). Fractions concepts and skills of form 1 and form 2 students in Brunei Darussalam. In H. S. Dhindsa, S. B. Lim, P. Achleitner, & M. A. Clements (Eds.), Studies in science, mathematics, and technical education (pp. 145-154), Universiti Brunei Darussalam
  48. Trivena, V., Ningsih, A. R., & Jupri, A. (2017). Misconception on addition and subtraction of fraction at primary school students in fifth-grade. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 895(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012139
  49. Tsng, Y. S., Shahrill, N., & Abdul, L. S. N. (2021). Exploring the effects and student’s views on the use of a tic-tac-toe game to teach mathematics in Brunei Darussalam. International Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Learning, 29(1), 50-65. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327- 7971/CGP/v29i01/49-65
  50. United States Department of Education. (2008). The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Available at https://www2.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/report/final- report.pdf
  51. Vamvakoussi, X., & Vosniadou, S. (2010). How many decimals are there between two fractions? aspects of secondary school students’ understanding of rational numbers and their notation. Cognition and Instruction, 28(2), 181-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370001003676603
  52. Ye, A., Resnick, I., Hansen, N., Rodrigues, J., Rinne, L., & Jordan, N. C. (2016). Pathways to fraction learning: Numerical abilities mediate the relation between early cognitive competencies and later fraction knowledge. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 152, 242-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.08.001
  53. Yusof, J., & Malone, J. (Eds.). (2003). Mathematical errors in fractions: A case of Bruneian primary 5 pupils (Paper presentation). Proceeding of the 26th annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia, Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Incorporated
  54. Zakaria, E., Solfitri, T., Daud, Y., & Abidin, Z. Z. (2013). Effect of cooperative learning on secondary school students’ mathematics achievement. Creative Education 4(2), 98-100. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.42014