Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 70 Download : 15

Main Article Content

Abstract

COVID-19 caused the learning process to change from a face-to-face learning process to a distance learning process by using various applications. However, this learning process is also considered less effective in math because students’ conceptual understanding is imperfect. The imperfection of this concept caused students to experience learning loss. This research aimed to analyze students’ learning loss in elementary schools in mathematics subjects. This research used a qualitative research design with a case study type of research. This research involved 280 fifth-grade students from 4 elementary schools. The research results showed that students experienced learning loss in understanding geometry and fraction concepts. Students cannot solve math problems if the problem contains two concepts at once. According to the students, they did not understand these three topics well because when studying these topics, they carried out a distance learning process. Based on these findings, researchers concluded that students experienced learning loss in the high category, with 82% students affected. This study highlights the need for teachers to address learning loss that students experience in geometry and fraction materials. Thus, mathematics teachers can prepare learning tools to help students overcome learning loss.

Keywords

Pandemic Covid-19 Math Learning Loss

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Sartono Sartono, Retno Triswandari, Sahrun Nisa, Serly Safitri, Yetti Ariani, Melva Zainil, Yullys Helsa

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA).

How to Cite
Sartono, S., Triswandari, R., Nisa, S., Safitri, S., Ariani, Y., Zainil, M., & Helsa, Y. (2024). Analysis of Students’ Learning Loss in Math in Padang City, Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 18(3), 431–446. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.v18i3.pp431-446
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abbas, N. A., Abdullah, N. A., Shahrill, M., & Tengah, K. A. (2022). Primary school pupils’ performance on the addition of fractions: Conceptual and procedural knowledge. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 16(2), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.16.2.17811.227-238
  2. Agarwala, V., Nath Sahu, T., & Maity, S. (2022). Learning loss amid closure of learning spaces during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 18(3), 93–109. http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/viewissue.php?id=66
  3. Altawalbeh, K., & Al-Ajlouni, A. (2022). The impact of distance learning on science education during the pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education, 5(1), 43–66. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.195
  4. Aryanti, D. (2023). Implementation of independent curriculum as an effort to overcome the learning loss [in Bahasa]. Educatio: Jurnal Ilmu Kependidikan, 18(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.29408/edc.v18i1.12286
  5. Aydemir, G., Orbay, K., & Orbay, M. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of geometry education research based on Web of Science Core Collection Database. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 11(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.34293/ education.v11i2.4483
  6. Banat, M. (2022). The exploratory practice: An approach for enhancing students’ learning process awareness. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 8(1), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.2586
  7. Belousova, A., Mochalova, Y., & Tushnova, Y. (2022). Attitude to distance learning of schoolchildren and students: Subjective assessments of advantages and disadvantages. Education Sciences, 12(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010046
  8. Blaskó, Z., da Costa, P., & Schnepf, S. V. (2021). Learning loss and educational inequalities in Europe: Mapping the potential consequences of the COVID-19 Crisis. Journal of European Social Policy, 32(4), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3833230
  9. Braithwaite, D. W., & Siegler, R. S. (2021). Putting fractions together. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(3), 556–571. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000477
  10. Brewster, B. J., & Miller, T. (2023). Reflections on mathematics ability, anxiety, and interventions. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(2), em0729. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12822
  11. Budiarto, M. T., Fuad, Y., & Sahidin, L. (2021). Teacher’s specialized content knowledge on the concept of square: A vignette approach. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 15(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.15.1.11653.1-22
  12. Cano, J. S. (2022). Comparative analysis of senior high school learners’ academic performance in traditional face-to-face and online distance learning modalities. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences, 4(4), 541–561. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.369
  13. Cumino, C., Pavignano, M., Spreafico, M. L., & Zich, U. (2021). Geometry to build models, models to visualize geometry. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 7(1), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-020-00080-6
  14. de Leeuw, S., Haelermans, C., Jacobs, M., van der Velden, R., van Vugt, L., & van Wetten, S. (2023). The role of family composition in students’ learning growth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Marriage and Family, January, 807–828. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12912
  15. Debes, G. (2021). Distance Learning in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Advantages and disadvantages. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 13(2), 1109–1118. http://ijci.wcci-international.org/index.php/IJCI/article/view/669
  16. Deringöl, Y. (2022). Parents’ mathematics anxiety and their contribution to mathematics education. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 9(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2022.9.1.374
  17. Donnelly, R., & Patrinos, H. A. (2022). Learning loss during COVID-19: An early systematic review. Prospects, 51(1), 601–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-021-09582-6
  18. Doz, D., Felda, D., & Cotič, M. (2022). High school students ’ attitudes towards geometry : An exploratory factor analysis. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(6), 2090–2104. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i6.7504
  19. Dron, J. (2022). Technology, teaching, and the many distances of distance learning. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 26(2), 7–17. https://www.jofdl.nz/index.php/JOFDL/article/view/557
  20. Farhan, F. S., & Lismandasari, L. (2022). The impact of online learning process during the COVID 19 pandemic: Possibly leading to learning loss?. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(4), 290–296. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.05.04.591
  21. Fresen, J. W. (2018). Embracing distance education in a blended learning model: challenges and prospects. Distance Education, 39(2), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1457949
  22. Gómez-García, G., Hinojo-Lucena, F. J., Alonso-García, S., & Romero-Rodríguez, J. M. (2021). Mobile learning in pre-service teacher education: Perceived usefulness of AR technology in primary education. Education Sciences, 11(6), 275–283. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060275
  23. Hanafiah, Sauri, R. S., Mulyadi, D., & Arifudin, O. (2022). Mitigating the impact of learning loss in improving the quality of learning in senior high schools [in Bahasa]. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(6), 1816–1823. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v5i6.642
  24. Hu, C., Deng, Y., Tian, W., & Zhao, Z. (2019). Optimal geometry to resolve 3D deformation from multiple GB-DInRad. Electronics Letters, 55(17), 953–955. https://doi.org/10.1049/el.2019.1564
  25. Huang, X., Huang, R., & Lai, M. Y. (2022). Exploring teacher learning process in chinese lesson study: A case of representing fractions on a number line. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 11(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-03-2021-0026
  26. Ilgün, S., Dastan, Z., & Altintas, E. (2023). The impact of using model-based activities based on the history of mathematics in geometry instruction on students ’ Geometry anxiety. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 18(4), 292–309. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2023.631.12
  27. Johar, R., Moulina, A. R., Mailizar, Lestari, M., & Away, Y. (2024). Development of e-learning based remedial video on fractions in middle school. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 18(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.v18i1.pp97-112
  28. Jojor, A., & Sihotang, H. (2022). Analysis of independent curriculum in overcoming learning loss during the COVID-19 pandemic (case study analysis of education policy) [in Bahasa]. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(4), 5150–5161. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i4.3106
  29. Juman, Z. A. M. S., Mathavan, M., Ambegedara, A. S., & Udagedara, I. G. K. (2022). Difficulties in learning Geometry component in mathematics and active-based learning methods to overcome the difficulties. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 10(2), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v10i2.4299
  30. Kantos, Z. E., Yurttaş, A., Taşdan, M., & Topcu, Z. (2022). Distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of both sides of accountability: Opinions of teachers and parents. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(1), 432–448. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.05.01.453
  31. Kaskens, J., van Luit, J. E. H., Segers, E., Verhoeven, L., & Goei, S. L. (2023). Dynamic mathematics interviews in primary education: The relationship between teacher professional development and mathematics teaching. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 25(1), 61–80. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=mathematics&id=EJ1382283
  32. Köprülü, F., Tangir, R. N., & Öznacar, B. (2022). Lecturers’ and students’ viewpoints of distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi, 13(1), 68–74. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.01.08
  33. Kotrikadze, E. V., & Zharkova, L. I. (2021). Advantages and disadvantages of distance learning in universities. Propósitos y Representaciones, 9(3), 1184–1192. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2021.v9nspe3.1184
  34. Kurniawan, H., & Budiyono. (2021). Heroe’ s model : Case study to reduce students’ learning loss and anxiety. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(3), 1122–1140. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i3.5830
  35. Laidin, D. R., & Tengah, K. A. (2021). Applying butterfly method in the learning of addition and subtraction of fractions. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 15(2), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.15.2.13934.161-174
  36. Lalas, J. W. (2021). What school leaders need to consider about virtual engagement at home during the pandemic: Learning loss or learning gain? A commentary. Educational Leadership and Administration: Teaching and Program Development, 33, 80–92. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1318530%0Ahttps://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1318530.pdf
  37. Lamanauskas, V., & Makarskaitė-Petkevičienė, R. (2021). Distance lectures in university studies: Advantages, disadvantages, improvement. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/10887
  38. Low, J., Shahrill, M., & Zakir, N. (2020). Solving fractions by applying the bar model concept with the butterfly method. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.14.2.11261.101-116
  39. Mamluah, S. K., & Maulidi, A. (2021). Distance learning (PJJ) during the COVID-19 pandemic in elementary schools [in Bahasa]. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(2), 869–877. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i2.800
  40. Mangera, E., Supratno, H., & Suyatno. (2023). Exploring the relationship between transhumanist and artificial intelligence in the education context: Particularly teaching and learning process at tertiary education. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi, 13(2), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.02.05
  41. Masfingatin, T., Murtafiah, W., & Maharani, S. (2020). Exploration of creative mathematical reasoning in solving geometric problems. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.14.2.7654.155-168
  42. McNeish, D., & Dumas, D. (2021). A seasonal dynamic measurement model for summer learning loss. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A: Statistics in Society, 184(2), 616–642. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12634
  43. Mulhamah, Purwanto, Susiswo, & Chandra, T. D. (2023). Partitive fraction schema: Mental action processes used to mathematics construct concepts in elementary students’. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(4), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.04.29
  44. Munro, C. (2022). Learning loss : A summer problem. BU Journal of Graduate Studies in Education, 14(2), 29–33. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=learning+loss&ff1=dtySince_2019&id=EJ1350843
  45. Muskita, N. S., Ramadhani, V. M., Padidi, A. S., Nurrochmah, D., & Kusumaningtyas, P. (2022). Blended learning: A solution to overcome learning loss in learning [in Bahasa]. SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan), 7(2), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.30998/sap.v7i2.13368
  46. Muthmainnah, A., & Rohmah, S. (2022). Learning loss: Distance learning analysis [in Bahasa]. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 969–996.
  47. Noviantari, I., & Faridhoh, F. (2021). Learning loss analysis of students' statistical literacy skills [in Bahasa]. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia, 6(3), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.33369/jpmr.v6i3.19104
  48. Nursyahidah, F., Albab, I. U., & Rubowo, M. R. (2023). Learning design of sphere using realistic mathematics education assisted by interactive video. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 17(3), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.17.3.20040.297-312
  49. Parahita, B. N., Ghufronudin, G., Astutik, D., Yuhastina, Y., & Siregar, R. S. (2022). Learning loss problems of students based on the teachers and parents’ perspectives as the Tri Sentra Pendidikan actors during online learning. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(1), 531–538. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.05.01.461
  50. Pereira, L., & Gomes, S. (2022). The impact of distance learning on the teaching-learning process of mathematics in higher technical education. Journal of Educators Online, 19(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2022.19.2.8
  51. Pradana, L. N., & Sholikhah, O. H. (2023). Spatial reasoning construction: The way to use it to solve geometric problems. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 17(2), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.17.2.20620.209-224
  52. Pratiwi, W. D. (2021). Dynamics of learning loss: Teachers and parents [in Bahasa]. Jurnal Edukasi NonformaL, 2(1), 147–153. https://ummaspul.e-journal.id/JENFOL/article/view/1847
  53. Resnick, I., Newcombe, N., & Goldwater, M. (2023). Reasoning about fraction and decimal magnitudes, reasoning proportionally, and mathematics achievement in Australia and the United States. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 9(1), 222–239. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.8249
  54. Reynolds, A. (2022). A mechanism to increase literacy and math skills to reduce summer learning loss. Education Leadership Review of Doctoral Research, 10(1), 48–68. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=learning+loss&id=EJ1380182
  55. Rhamdan, D., Kule, A., & Al Wahid, S. M. (2021). Analisis Pemanfaatan e-Learning di Masa Pandemi (Studi Kepustakaan: Learning Loss pada Peserta Didik). Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kewirausahaan, 9(2), 432–446. https://doi.org/10.47668/pkwu.v9i2.263
  56. Sari, Y. M., Fiangga, S., El Milla, Y. I., & Puspaningtyas, N. D. (2023). Exploring students’ proportional reasoning in solving guided-unguided area conservation problem: A case of Indonesian students. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(2), 375–394. https://doi.org/10.22342/JME.V14I2.PP375-394
  57. Sartono, & Karso. (2020). Are the Fractions difficult? A case study at Elementary School 033 Asmi. The 2nd International Conference on Elementary Education, 2, 1029–1043. http://proceedings2.upi.edu/index.php/icee/article/view/714
  58. Sayginer, C. (2023). Examining University students’ behavioural intention to distance learning during COVID-19: An extended Tam Model. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 24(2), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1123213
  59. Semenets-Orlova, I., Klochko, A., Tereshchuk, O., Denisova, L., Nestor, V., & Sadovyi, S. (2022). Special aspects of educational managers’ administrative activity under conditions of distance learning. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 11(1), 286–297. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v11n1p286
  60. Song, S., Li, T., Quintero, M., & Wang, Z. (2023). The link between math anxiety and math achievement: The role of afterschool learning. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 9(3), 418–432. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.11325
  61. Soon, Z., & Lauridsen, M. (2021). The benefits of multimodal interactive case studies. HAPS Educator, 25(2), 53–76. https://doi.org/10.21692/haps.2021.011
  62. Sukasno, Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., & Somakim. (2024). Students’ cognitive processes in understanding fractions through the tourist context. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 18(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.v18i1.pp27-38
  63. Syamsiah, & Pada, A. (2023). Learning loss that occurred in the implementation of online learning for grade IV elementary school students in Cluster 2, Biringkanaya District, Makassar City [in Bahasa]. Pinisi: Journal of Teacher Professional, 4(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.26858/tpj.v4i1.36181
  64. Tastepe, M. (2023). Examination of pre-service teachers’ perceptions of the concept of fraction using the word association test. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 9(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.20448/edu.v9i1.4520
  65. Tessema, G., Michael, K., & Areaya, S. (2024). Realist hands-on learning approach and its contributions to learners’ conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills on solid geometry. Pedagogical Research, 9(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14096
  66. Todd, A., & Romine, W. (2018). The learning loss effect in genetics: What ideas do students retain or lose after instruction? CBE Life Sciences Education, 17(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-10-0310
  67. Toker, T. (2022). Detecting possible learning losses due to COVID-19 Pandemic: An application of curriculum-based assessment. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 9(1), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.985992
  68. Tossavainen, A., & Helenius, O. (2024). Student teachers’ conceptions of fractions: a framework for the analysis of different aspects of fractions. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 26(1), 1–20. https://mted.merga.net.au/index.php/mted/article/view/889
  69. Trongtorsak, S., Saraubon, K., & Nilsook, P. (2021). Collaborative experiential learning process for enhancing digital entrepreneurship. Higher Education Studies, 11(1), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v11n1p137
  70. Turan-Güntepe, E., Durmuş, T., & Dönmez-Usta, N. (2023). Assessment of distance learning practices during the COVID-19 pandemic in Grades K-12. Athens Journal of Education, 10(2), 249–270. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.10-2-4
  71. Viktoria, V., & Aida, M. (2020). Comparative analysis on the impact of distance learning between Russian and Japanese University Students, during the Pandemic of COVID-19. Education Quarterly Reviews, 3(4), 438–446. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.03.04.151
  72. Watson-Held, H. A., Gray, J., & Grodziak, E. (2024). Promoting positive instructional designer and faculty relations: A case study from a State University. Journal of Educators Online, 21(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2024.21.1.1
  73. Widyasari, A., Widiastono, M. R., Sandika, D., & Tanjung, Y. (2022). The phenomenon of learning loss as an impact of education during the COVID-19 Pandemic [in Bahasa]. BEST JOURNAL (Biology Education Science & Technology), 5(1), 297–302.
  74. Yazici Arici, E., Yigit, N. B., & Uyanık Aktulun, Ö. (2023). The effect of Web 2.0 supported geometry activities on children’s geometry skills. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 7(4), 454–469. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.510
  75. Yegorina, D., Armstrong, I., Kravtsov, A., Merges, K., & Danhoff, C. (2021). Multi-user geometry and geography augmented reality applications for collaborative and gamified STEM learning in primary school. Review of Education, 9(3), e3319. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3319
  76. Zhang, H., Li, H., Wang, Z., Yue, Y., & Chen, S. (2020). Geometry and context guided refinement for stereo matching. IET Image Processing, 14(12), 2652–2659. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ipr.2019.1636
  77. Zhdanov, S. P., Baranova, K. M., Udina, N., Terpugov, A. E., Lobanova, E. V., & Zakharova, O. V. (2022). Analysis of Learning losses of students during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(3), 369–379. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11812

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.