Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

The aims ofthis research were to find out the different effect of each categories of learning model, students interpersonal intelligence and their interaction towards students mathematics learning achievement on the subject of plane geometry.The research was quasi experimental with 3×3 factorial design. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways analysis of variance at the significance level of 0,05. Based on hypothesis test, it can be concluded  that:  (1)  the  cooperative  learning  model  of  Jigsaw  type  gives  a  better mathematics achievement than cooperative learning model of NHT type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type gives a better mathematics achievement than direct learning model; (2) students with the high interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the medium interpersonal intelligence, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had better achievement than students with the low interpersonal intelligence, and the students with the medium interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the low interpersonal intelligence; (3) on the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type, NHT type and direct learning model, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the medium  interpersonal  intelligence,  students  with  the  high interpersonal intelligence  had better achievement than students with the low interpersonal intelligence and the students with the medium interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the low interpersonal intelligence; and (4) on students interpersonal intelligence high, medium and low, the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gives a better mathematics achievement than cooperative learning model of NHT type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type gives a better mathematics achievement than direct learning model.

Keywords

Jigsaw NHT interpersonal intelligence

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2017 Kiki Riska Ayu Kurniawati, Budiyono, Dewi Retno Sari Saputro

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA).

How to Cite
Kurniawati, K. R. A., Budiyono, & Saputro, D. R. S. (2025). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw dan NHT Ditinjau dari Kecerdasan Interpersonal Siswa pada Pokok Bahasan Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 15–27. Retrieved from https://jpm.ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jpm/article/view/292
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ahmad dan Jazuli, A. (2009). Jigsaw Type of Cooperative Learning as a Means of Improving High School-Students‟ Mathematical Communication Ability. International Journal for Educational Studies. 1 (2), 207-218.
  2. Arianti Puspita Dewi. (2014). Eksperimentasi Model Numbered Heads Together dengan Make A Match (NHT MM) dan Numbered Heads Together dengan Bamboo Dancing (NHT BD) Ditinjau dari Kecerdasan Interpersonal. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika. 2 (2), 193-201.
  3. Baker, D. P. (2013). The Effects of Implementing The Cooperative Learning Structure, Numbered Heads Together, in Chemistry Classes at A Rural, Low Performing High School. Tesis: Louisiana State University.
  4. Chan, D. W. (2005). Perceived Multiple Intelligences and Learning Preferences Among Chinese Gifted Students in Hong Kong. Journal for the Education of the Gifted. 29 (2), 187–212.
  5. Cheong, C. (2010). From Group-based Learning to Cooperative Learning: A Metacognitive Approach to Project- based Group Supervision. International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline. 13, 73-86.
  6. Erlyn Yustantina. (2009). Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw dan Student Achievement Divisions (STAD) Ditinjau dari Kecerdasan Interpersonal Siswa. Tesis. Surakarta: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Sebelas Maret.
  7. Ewing, B. (2011). Direct Instruction In Mathematics: Issues For Schools With High Indigenous Enrolments: A Literature Review. Australian Journal of Teacher Education. 36 (5), 64-91.
  8. Goos, M. (2004). Learning Mathematics in a Classroom Community of Inquiry. Journal of Research of Mathematics Education. 35 (4), 258- 291.
  9. Katherine Her Pratiwi. (2013). Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw dan Numbered Heads Together (NHT) Ditinjau dari Kemandirian Belajar pada Prestasi Belajar Matematika Peserta Didik SMA Se- Kabupaten Magelang Tahun Pelajaran 2012/2013. Tesis. Surakarta: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Sebelas Maret.
  10. Maheady, L., Michielle-Pendl, J., Harper, G., dan Mallette, B. (2006). The Effect of Numbered Head Together With and Without an Incentive Package on The Science Test Performance of a Diverse Group of Sixth Graders. Journal of Behavioral Education. 15 (1), 24-38.
  11. Naomi, M. W. dan Githua, B. N. (2013). Effects of Jigsaw Cooperative Learning Strategy on Students‟ Achievement in Secondary School Mathematics in Laikipia East District, Kenya. Asian Journal of Management Sciences And Education. 2 (3), 177-188.
  12. Paul Suparno. (2013). Teori Inteligensi Ganda dan Aplikasinya di Sekolah. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
  13. Purnama, I. L., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2016). Kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa ditinjau melalui model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe complete sentence dan team quiz. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10 (1). 26-42.
  14. Sengül, S. dan Katranci, Y. (2012). Teaching the Subject‚ Sets‛ with the Dissociation and Re-Association‟ (Jigsaw). International Online Journal of Educational Sciences. 4 (1), 1-18.
  15. Sulani. (2010). Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw Pada Materi Pokok Sistem Persamaan Linier Ditinjau dari Motivasi Belajar Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri Se- Kabupaten Tulungagung Tahun Ajaran 2009/2010. Tesis. Surakarta: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Sebelas Maret.
  16. Sulistyana. (2013). Eksperimentasi Pembelajaran ‘Think-Pair-Share’ dengan Pendekatan Matematika Realistik dan ‘Numbered Heads Together’ dengan Pendekatan Matematika Realistik Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Ditinjau Dari Kecerdasan Interpersonal Siswa di Kabupaten Gunungkidul. Tesis. Surakarta: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Sebelas Maret.
  17. Tran, V. D. dan Lewis, R. (2012). The Effects of Jigsaw Learning on Students‟ Attitudes in a Vietnamese Higher Education Classroom. International Journal of Higher Education. 1 (2), 9-20.
  18. Xie, J. C. dan Lin, R. L. (2009). Research on Multiple Intelligences Teaching and Assessment. Asian Journal of Management and Humanity Sciences. 4 (2-3), 106-124.
  19. Zakaria, E. dan Iksan, Z. (2007). Promoting Cooperative Learning in Science and Mathematics Education: A Malaysian Perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 3 (1), 35-39.
  20. Zarei, A. A. dan Mohseni, F. (2012). On the Relationship Between Multiple Intelligences and Grammatical and Writing Accuracy of Iranian Learners of English. Journal of New World Sciences Academy. 10 (7), 1306-1317.