Main Article Content

Abstract

The aim of the study is to analyze the conceptual understanding and self regulated learning in mathematics between students who got the e-learning model web centric course and learning with the power point, and to find out the appropriate e-learning design in learning math for elementary school. The subject of this study is all of the 5th grade students of Islamic Elementary School (MI) private in Jakarta, while the sample is two classes of the population. The instruments used in this study are essay, questionnaire, and observation sheet. The results showed that 1) the conceptual understanding of mathematics students who get e-learning model web centric course better than students who get the learning using power point, 2) self regulated learning of students who get e-learning model web centric course better than students who get the learning using power point, 3) e- learning design that fits in the learning of mathematics in primary schools is an e-learning design, incorporating text, images and animations as well as providing convenience for group discussion. Based on these results it can be  concluded  that  the  e-learning  web-centric  model  of  course  affect  the  conceptual  understanding  of mathematics and self regulated learning elementary school students.

Keywords

Concept Understanding E-Learning Self Regulated Learning

Article Details

How to Cite
Arifin, F., & Herman, T. (2025). Pengaruh Pembelajaran E-Learning Model Web Centric Course Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep dan Kemandirian Belajar Matematika Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 1–12. Retrieved from https://jpm.ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jpm/article/view/381

References

  1. Yucel, A.S. (2006). E-learning approach in teacher training. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 7 (4), 1-8.
  2. Bains, M, et.al. (2011). Effectiveness and acceptability of face-to-face blended and e-learning: a randomized trial of orthodontic undergraduates. European Journal of Dental Education, 15 (2), 110-117
  3. Bawaneh, S.S. (2011). The effects of blended learning approach on students performance: evidence from a computerized accounting course. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research in Business, 1 (4), 43–50.
  4. Castle, S.R., & McGuire, C.J. (2010). An analysis of student self assessment of online, blended, and face to face learning environments: implication for sustainable education delivery. (Versi elektronik). Journal of International Education Studies, 3 (3), 36-46.
  5. Ibrahim, Septumarsa, D., & Suardiman, S.P. (2014). Pengaruh penggunaan e-learning terhadap motivasi dan prestasi belajar matematika siswa SD negeri tahunan Yogyakarta. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 2 (1), 67-79.
  6. Izzati, N. & Suryadi, D. (2010). Komunikasi Matematik dan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik. Makalah Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta
  7. Jayadinata, & Kurnia, A. (2013). Efektifitas e-learning melalui penggunaan media edmodo pada pendidikan lingkungan hidup untuk sekolah dasar. Prosiding dalam Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Dasar 2013, 14-24. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: Bandung.
  8. Lynn, J.M., et.al. (2014). Blended learning: how teachers balance the blend of online and classroom components. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 13 (2), 121-140.
  9. Albano, G. (2012). A knowledge skill competencies e-learning model in mathematics. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal (RUSC), 9 (1), 306-319.
  10. Jusoff, K., & Khodabandelou, R. (2009). Preliminery study on the role of social presence in blended learning environment in higher education. Journal of International Education Studies, 2 (4), 82-92.
  11. Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: helping children learn mathematics. Wasington DC: National Academy Press.
  12. Marzani. (2011). Penerapan E-Learning Berbasis Moodle untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa pada Konsep Cahaya di SMP. Unpublished Thesis. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: Bandung.
  13. Mubaraq, L. (2009). Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Web Pada Materi Fluida Dinamis Untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep Dan Keterampilan Generic Sains Siswa. Unpublished Thesis. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: Bandung.
  14. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and Standard for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
  15. Ngadiyo. (2007). Pembelajaran E-learning dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Pendidikan. Makalah E- learning/Pelatihan JARDIKNAS 2007.
  16. Noesgaard, S.S. & Rikke. (2015). The effectiveness of e-learning: an explorative and integrative review of the definitions, methodologies and factors that promote e-learning effectiveness. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13 (4), 278-290.
  17. Rusman. (2012). Belajar dan pembelajaran berbasis komputer: mengembangkan profesionalisme guru abad 21. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
  18. Sagala, S. (2011). Konsep dan makna pembelajaran untuk membantu memecahkan problematika belajar dan mengajar. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  19. Umoh, J.B. & Ekemini, T.A. (2014). Challenges of blended e-learning tools in mathematics: students’ perspectives university of uyo canadian center of science and education. Journal of Education and Learning, 3, (4), 60-70.
  20. Usman, M. (2003). Kecenderungan Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika. Prosiding dalam Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Tahun 2016, 1-5. Universitas Pattimura: Ambon.
  21. Zulkardi. (2003). Pendidikan Matematika di Indonesia: Beberapa Permasalahan dan Upaya Penyelesaiannya. Makalah dalam Seminar Nasional FKIP Universitas Sriwijaya: Palembang.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.