Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aimed to produce a valid and practical product in the form of a student worksheet using the Indonesian version of the Realistic Mathematics Education (PMRI) approach in the classroom context with an orientation toward students’ conceptual understanding and to figure out the potential effect of the student worksheet developed. It is a piece of development research under the ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation) model. Data collection was performed using documentation, a questionnaire, and a test. The object of this research was the development of a student worksheet using the PMRI approach within the classroom context with an orientation toward students’ conceptual understanding. Meanwhile, the subjects of the research were students of grade X of SMAN 06 Banyuasin. The research results showed that the student worksheet produced was declared valid (with an average score of 90.83), practical (based on the students’ questionnaire responses, with a score of 79.65), and potentially influential to a high degree (based on the students’ test results, with a percentage of 84%). Therefore, the student worksheet that was developed using the PMRI approach within the classroom context with an orientation toward students’ conceptual understanding was worth using in the learning process.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.16.2.14854.203-214

Keywords

Student Worksheet PMRI Classroom Context Conceptual Understanding

Article Details

How to Cite
Nova, E., Retta, A. M., & Nopriyanti, T. D. (2024). Student Worksheet Development Using the PMRI Approach in the Classroom Context with an Orientation toward Students’ Conceptual Understanding. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 16(2), 203–214. Retrieved from https://jpm.ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jpm/article/view/190

References

  1. Adha, I., & Refianti, R. (2019). Development of student worksheets (LKS) using a realistic Indonesian mathematics approach based on the context of South Sumatra [in Bahasa]. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika: Judika Education, 2(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.31539/judika.v2i1.729
  2. Afriansyah, E. A. (2016). Realistic meaning in RME and PMRI [in Bahasa]. Lemma, 96-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22202/jl.2016.v2i2.57B
  3. Ardilla, A., & Hartanto, S. (2017). Factors that influence the low mathematics learning outcomes of students at MTs Iskandar Muda Batam [in Bahasa]. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.33373/pythagoras.v6i2.966
  4. Edriati, S., Handayani, S., & Sari, N. P. (2017). The use of crossword puzzles as a repetition strategy in improving the understanding of mathematical concepts for class XI social sciences high school students [in Bahasa]. Jurnal Pelangi, 9(2), 71-78. https://doi.org/10.22202/jp.2017.v9i2.2047
  5. Engel, V. J., Angela, D., & Hutagalung, M. (2016). Internet of things context inference model on smart farming system [in Bahasa]. Jurnal Telematika , 11(2), 49-54.
  6. Gustiningsi, T., & Utari, R. S. (2020). Application of PMRI approach for education community volunteers in learning mathematics [in Bahasa]. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Postgraduate Program in PGRI Palembang University, 116-121.
  7. Haji, S. (2013). Iceberg's approach to learning fraction division in elementary school [in Bahasa]. Infinity Journal, 2 (1), 75-84. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v2i1.p75-84
  8. Hamzah, H. (2019). Career maturity theory and measurement [in Bahasa]. Malang: Literasi Nusantara.
  9. Haviz, M. (2013). Research and development: Research in the field of education that is innovative, productive and meaningful. Jurnal Ta'dib, 16(1), 28-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.31958/jt.v16i1.235
  10. Hendrayana, A. (2017). The effect of Rigorous Mathematical Thinking (RMT) learning on the mathematical conceptual understanding of junior high school students [in Bahasa]. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2) 186-199. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i2.15385
  11. Istarani. (2014). 58 innovative learning models [in Bahasa]. Medan : Media Persada
  12. Jaheman, A. A., Gunur, B., & Jelatu, S. (2019). The effect of realistic mathematics approach on students' understanding of mathematical concepts [in Bahasa]. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 191-202. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v8i2.454
  13. Kadir, & La, M. (2016). The use of context and prior knowledge of mathematics in learning students' creative thinking skills [in Bahasa]. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 52-66. https://dx.doi.org/10.36709/jpm.v5i1.2041
  14. Maqruf, A., & Ulpah, M. (2020). Development of student worksheets (LKS) based on Islamic context to improve student's mathematics understanding in class XI matrix material. Jurnal Penelitian Agama, 21(1), 92-112.
  15. Muliastrini, N. K., Gotama, P. B., & Putra, I. P. (2022). Development of scientific literacy Oriented Student Worksheets (LKPD) in science learning amidst the Covid-19 Pandemic [in Bahasa]. Lampuhyang, 13 (1), 122-131. https://doi.org/10.47730/jurnallampuhyang.v13i1.292
  16. Mulyatiningsih, E. (2014). Applied Research Methods in Education [in Bahasa]. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  17. Mu'tashimah, A., Putri, A. D., & Ramury, F. (2020). Candles as context of tube material in PMRI-Based LKPD [in Bahasa]. JKPM (Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Matematika), 6(1), 83-98.
  18. Naila, R., Tasya, N., Rahayu, E. S., & Hidayat, W. (2018). Analysis of counting operational errors for vocational high school students on matrix materials with problem based learning approaches [in Bahasa]. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 2, 1851– 1853.
  19. OECD. (2019). From PISA 2018 results combined execitive summaries. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/about/publishing/corrigenda.htm
  20. Purwanto, N. (2009). The principles and techniques of teaching evaluation [in Bahasa]. Remaja Rosda Karya.
  21. Retta, A. M. (2016). The Use of Iceberg in the Indonesian Realistic Mathematics Education Approach (PMRI) [in Bahasa]. Proceedings of the National Education Seminar, 1(1), 72-80.
  22. Rosliana, I. (2019). Development of mathematics LKPD with 7E learning cycle model assisted by mind mapping [in Bahasa]. Jurnal Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika, 1(1), 10-22. https://doi.org/10.14421/jppm.2019.p11-02
  23. Ruminta. (2014). Linear equation matrix and linear programming [in Bahasa]. Bandung: Rekayasa Sains.
  24. Safitri, A. W., Pujiastuti, H., & Sudiana, R. (2020). Development of educational games with the context of local wisdom of Banten on matrix material [in Bahasa]. Journal of Medives: Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang, 4(2), 10-22. https://doi.org/10.31331/medivesveteran.v4i2.1171
  25. Saputri, N. W., & Zulkardi. (2020). Development of LKPD mathematical modeling for junior high school students using the context of online motorcycle taxis [in Bahasa]. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika , 14(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.14.1.6825.1-14
  26. Sari, P. (2017). Understanding of students' mathematical concepts on the subject of large angles through the PMRI approach [in Bahasa]. Jurnal Gantang, 2(1), 41-50. https://dx.doi.org/10.31629/jg.v2i1.60
  27. Ulia, N. (2016). Improved understanding of the mathematical concept of flat shape material with group investigation type cooperative learning with a scientific approach in elementary school [in Bahasa]. Jurnal Tunas Bangsa, 3(2), 55-68.
  28. Warni, R., Simangunsong, V. H., Tiofanny, Gultom, D. I., Limbong, C., Manik, E., et al. (2022). The Effect of mathematics learning through the Indonesian Realistic Mathematics Education Approach (PMRI) on student learning outcomes on transformation materials [in Bahasa]. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai , 6(1), 1660-1667. https://doi.org/10.35314/inovish.v6i1.1949
  29. Wati, E. H., & Murtiyasa, B. (2016). Middle school students' mistakes in solving pisa-based math problems on change and relationship content [in Bahasa]. National Conference on Mathematics Research and Learning (KNPMP I), 199 - 209.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.