Article Sidebar

article 05
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 48 Download : 25

Main Article Content

Abstract

Teaching approach applied by mathematics teacher can affect students' mathematical connection ability (MCA). The fact shows that there are still many teachers using conventional learning, causing passive students and low MCA among students. The purpose of this study was to describe the effectiveness of applying a collaborative realistic mathematics education (RME) approach using the classroom and the outdoor environment to improve students' MCA on the topic of similar triangles. This quasi-experimental research with a qualitative descriptive approach took the subject of ninth-grade students at a public junior high school in Jember, Indonesia. Data were collected using observation sheets, questionnaires, tests, and interviews. The data were analyzed using the effectiveness test (N-gain score). The results showed that the application of collaborative RME using the indoor and outdoor classrooms made students more active in physical, social, and mental activities. This learning is effective in improving students' MCA. The average score of 57.47 in the pre-test increased to 93.88 in the post- test, and the N-gain score was 0.86. Mathematics teachers are advised to apply this learning approach, not only on the topic of similarity triangles, but also on other suitable topics.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.16.3.17883.303-324

Keywords

Collaborative RME Indoor and Outdoor Classroom Mathematical Connection Ability (MCA) Student and Teacher Responses

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Didik Sugeng Pambudi, Sunardi, Titik Sugiarti

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA).

How to Cite
Pambudi, D. S., Sunardi, & Sugiarti, T. (2024). Learning Mathematics Using a Collaborative RME Approach in the Indoor and Outdoor Classrooms to Improve Students’ Mathematical Connection Ability. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 16(3), 303–324. Retrieved from https://jpm.ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jpm/article/view/148
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Acar, H. (2015). Learning Environments for Children in Outdoor Spaces. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, (Vol. 141, pp. 846–853. Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro. 2014.05.147.
  2. Ardiyani, Gunarhadi, & Riyadi. (2018). Realistic mathematics education in cooperative learning viewed from learning activity. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(2), 301-310. https://ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jme/article/view/5392.
  3. Arikunto, S. (2013). Procedure of Research A Practice Approach [in bahasa]. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
  4. Astuti, P., Hartono, Y., Bunayati, H., & Indaryanti. (2017). Development of workbooks based on mathematical modeling approach to practice mathematical connection ability of class VIII junior high school students [in bahasa]. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.11.2.4613.61-78
  5. Ball, D. L. & Bass, H. (2000). Making believe: The Collective Construction of Public Mathematical Knowledge in the Elementary Classroom. In Phillips, D. C. Constructivism in Education. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810010200707.
  6. Bearnes, S. & Ross, H. (2010). Journeys outside the classroom. Journal of Adventure and Outdoor Learning, 10(2), 95-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2010.505708.
  7. Bilton, H. (2014). The aims of early years outdoor education in England: A conceptual and empirical investigation. International Journal of Education and Social Science, 1(3), 38-50.
  8. Bustang, Zulkardi, Darmawijoyo, Dolk, M., & Van Erde, D. (2013). Developing a local instruction theory for learning the concept of angle through visual field activities and spatial representations. International Education Studies, 6(8), 58-70.https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1068731.pdf.
  9. Cahyono, A. N. & Ludwig, M. (2018). Exploring mathematics outside the classroom with the help of GPS-Enabled mobile phone application. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983, 012152. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012152.
  10. Creswell, J. W. (2014), Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, 4th edition. Boston London: Pearson.
  11. Eli, J., Schroeder, M. J., & Lee, C. W. (2013). Mathematical connections and their relationship to mathematics knowledge for teaching geometry. School Science and Mathematics,113(3), 120- 134. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12009.
  12. Elpina, D., Syarifuddin, H., & Yerizon, Y. (2020). Development of realistic mathematics education- based learning device to improve students’ mathematical connection. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1554 (2020) 012014.
  13. Fägerstam, E. & Blom, J. (2012). Learning biology and mathematics outdoors: effects and attitudes in a swedish high school context, Journal of Adventure & Outdoor Learning,1-20. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2011.647432.
  14. Fauziah, A., Putri, R. I. I., Zulkardi, & Somakim. (2020). Developing PMRI learning environment through lesson study for pre-service primary school teacher. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(2), 193-208. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.2.10914.193-208.
  15. Febriyanti, Bagaskorowati, R., & Makmuri (2019). The effect of the Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach and the initial ability of students on the ability of students’ mathematical connection. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 1(3), 153-156. https://doi.org/10.1029103/ijevs.v1.3.2117.
  16. García-García, J. & Dolores-Flores, C. (2018). Intra-mathematical connections made by high school students in performing calculus tasks. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(2), 227–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1355994.
  17. Haji, S., Abdullah, M. I., Maizora, S., & Yumiati (2017). Developing students’ ability of mathematical connection through using outdoor mathematics learning. Infinity Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(1), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v6i1.234.
  18. Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores. Woodland Hills: Dept. of Physics, Indiana University.
  19. Harun, M. T. & Salamuddin, N. (2014). Promoting social skills through outdoor education and assesing its’ effects. Asian Social Science,10(5), 71-78. https://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n5p71.
  20. Hasbi, M., Lukito, A., & Sulaiman, R. (2019). The realistic of mathematic educational approach to enhancing ability mathematical connections. IJTMER 2(4), 179-183. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v2i4.82.
  21. Hasibuan, A. M., Saragih, S., & Amry, Z. (2019). Development of learning material based on realistic mathematics education to improve problem solving ability and students learning independence. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 243- 252. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/4000.
  22. Hossain, M. A., Tarmizi, R. A., & Ayub, A. F. M. (2012). Collaborative and cooperative learning in malaysian mathematics education. Journal on Mathematics Education 3(2), 102-114. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.3.2.569.103-114
  23. Inawati, P. S., Hobri, Pambudi, D. S., Guswanto, E., & Sya’roni, A. R. (2020). Students’ mathematical creative skill using interactive application media based on collaborative learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1538, 012084.
  24. Kellert, S. R. (2002). Experiencing Nature: Affective, Cognitive, and Evaluate Development in Children. In P.H. Kann, Jr. & S. R. Kellert (Eds). Children and Nature: Psychological, Sociocultural, and Evolutionary Investigations. MIT Press, 117-151. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress%2F1807.003.0006.
  25. Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31(2012), 486-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091.
  26. Laurens, T., Batlolona, F. A., Batlolona, J. R., & Leasa, M. (2018). How does Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) improve students’ mathematics cognitive achievement. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2), 569-578. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/76959.
  27. Legault, L. (2016). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation. Springer International Publishing AG, 1-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1139-1.
  28. Menanti, H., Sinaga, B., & Hasratuddin. (2018). Improve mathematical connections skills with realistic mathematics education-based learning. Advances in Social Sciences, Education and Humanities Research, 200(1), 29-35. https://dx.doi.org/10.2991/aisteel-18.2018.7.
  29. MoEC. (2013). Curriculum 2013 [in bahasa]. Jakarta: MoEC.
  30. Moss, M. (2009). Outdoor Mathematical Experiences: Constructivism, Connections, and Health. In: Clarke B; Grevholm B; Millman R. (eds) Tasks in Primary Mathematics Teacher Education. Springer, Boston, MA. Mathematics Teacher Education, 4(1):263-273. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09669-8_17.
  31. NCTM. (2014). Principles to action: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: NCTM.
  32. Novak, J. D. (2011). A Theory of Education: Meaningful Learning Underlies The Constructive Integration of Thinking, Feeling and Acting Leading To Empowerment for Commitment and Responsibility. Aprendizagem Significativa em Revista/Meaningful Learning Review, 1(2),1-14.
  33. Pambudi, D. S., Budayasa, I. K., & Lukito, A. (2020). the role of mathematical connections in mathematical problem solving. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.14.2.10985.129-144.
  34. Pambudi, D. S. (2020). Exploration of Students Mathematical Connections with Negative Attitudes in Solving a Contextual Geometry Problem. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1663(1), 2031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1663/1/012031.
  35. Pambudi, D. S. (2022). The effect of outdoor learning method on elementary students’ motivation and achievement in geometry. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 747-764. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15143a.
  36. Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667-686. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667.
  37. Polman, J., Hornstra, L., & Volman, M. (2020). The meaning of meaningfull learning in mathematics in upper-primary education. Learning Environments Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984- 020-09337-8.
  38. Richmond, D., Sibthorp, J., Gookin, J., Annarella, S., & Ferri, S. (2017). Complementing classroom learning through outdoor adventure education : Out-of-school-time experiences that make a difference. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2017.1324313.
  39. Said, I. A., Pambudi, D. S., Hobri, Safik, M., & Insani, K. (2021). Development of mathematics learning tools with Realistic Mathematics Education-Jumping Task (RME-JT) and its effect on the mathematics communication skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1839, 012018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1839/1/012018.
  40. Saminanto & Kartono. (2015). Analysis of mathematical connection ability in linear equation with one variable based on connectivity theory. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(4), 259-270. https://www.ijern.com/journal/2015/April-2015/22.pdf.
  41. Sawyer, A. (2008). Making connections: Promoting connectedness in early mathematics education. Paper presented at the 31st annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download doi=10.1.1.523.3273&rep= rep1& type=pdf.
  42. Sharan, Y. (2015). Meaningful learning in the co-operative classroom. International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 43(1): 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2015.961723.
  43. Siregar, N. D. & Surya, E. (2017). Analysis of students’ junior high school mathematical connection ability. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 33(2), 309-320.
  44. Smarter Scotland Scottish Goverment (2010). Curriculum for excellence through outdoor learning. SSSG Scotland. Retrived from https://education.gov.scot/Documents/cfe-through-outdoor- learning.pdf. https://education.gov.scot/documents/cfe-through-outdoor-learning.pdf.
  45. Sugiman, (2008). Mathematical Connections in Mathematics Learning Process at Junior High School [in bahasa]. http://staff.uny.ac.id/dosen/Dr-sugiman-MSi.
  46. Sugiyono. (2015). Methode of Quantitative and Qualitative Research R&D [in Bahasa]. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  47. Sunardi & Sugiarti, T. (2018). Research Report. [in bahasa]. Jember: LP2M Unej. Sundayana. 2015. Statistics for Educational Research [in Bahasa]. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  48. Thomas, G. J. (2018). Effective teaching and learning strategies in outdoor education, findings from two residential programmes based in Australia. Journal of Adventure and Outdoor Learning, 19(3):1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2018.1519450.
  49. Tohidi, H. & Jabbari, M. M. (2012). The effects of motivation in education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 820-824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.148.
  50. Vallori, A. B. (2014). Meaningful learning in practice. Journal of Education and Human Development, 3(4), 199-209. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v3n4a18.
  51. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Drijvers, P. (2014). Realistic Mathematics Education. S. Lerman (ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education. Springer: Dorddrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8.
  52. Waite, S. (2011). teaching and learning outside the classroom: personal values, alternative pedagogies, and standards. Education 3-13,39(1), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 03004270903206141.
  53. Zulkardi, & Putri, R. I. I. (2019). New School Mathematics Curricula, PISA and PMRI in Indonesia. In. C.P. Visto.Yu and T.L.Toh (Eds.), School Mathematics Curricula, Mathematics Education: An Asian Perspective, 39-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6312-23.
  54. Zulkardi, & Putri, R. I. I. (2020). Supporting mathematics teachers to develop jumping task using PISA framework (JUMPISA). Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.14.2.12115.199-210.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.