Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of giving Open-Ended questions in cooperative learning model, STAD type, to students’ mathematical problem solving ability. This study was conducted in SMP Santa Theresia Central Jakarta. The method used in this study is quasi-experimental. The technics of data collection of this study are test of mathematical problem solving abilty and Mathematics initial knowledge. The results of this study show that (1) mathematical problem solving abilty of students  who are taught by giving Open-Ended questions in cooperative learning model, STAD type, is higher than the abilty of mathematical problem solving of those who are taught by using conventional learning model, (2) there is no interaction between learning model and Mathematics initial knowledge to mathematical problem solving abilty, (3) there is significant difference of mathematical problem solving ability of students who are taught by giving Open-Ended questions in cooperative learning model, STAD type and mathematical problem solving ability of students who are taught by using conventional learning model among student group whose Mathematics intial knowledge is high, (4) there is no significant difference of mathematical problem solving ability of students who are taught by giving Open-Ended questions in cooperative learning model, STAD type and mathematical problem solving ability of students who are taught by using conventional learning model among student group whose Mathematics intial knowledge is low.

Keywords

STAD Open-Ended Problem Solving

Article Details

How to Cite
Rumapea, R. (2025). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Stad dan Pemberian Soal Open-Ended Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Awal Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 1–14. Retrieved from https://jpm.ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jpm/article/view/303

References

  1. Dick W. dan Carrey L. (1996). The Systematic Design Of Instruction. New York: Harper Collins College Publisher.
  2. Kompas Online. (2013). “Skor PISA: Posisi Indonesia Nyaris Jadi Juru Kunci.” Online. http://www.kopertis12.or.id/2013/12/05/skor-pisa-posisi-indonesia-nyaris- jadi-juru-kunci.html (Diakses Jumat, 12 Desember 2014 pukul 18.00 Wib).
  3. Polya. (1973). How To Solve It. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  4. Pranoto. (2017). “Kasmaran Bermatematika.” Online. http://www.bincangedukasi.com/kasmaran- bermatematika/ (Diakses Minggu, 6 Agustus 2017 pukul 17.50 Wib).
  5. Rahman, Sidiq Aulia. (2013). “Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah, Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Matematis, dan Adversity Quotient Siswa SMP Dengan Pendekatan Open-Ended.” Tesis. Bandung: PPs Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
  6. Rosita, Neneng Tita. (2012). “Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Pendekatan Open-Ended Dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa.” Tesis. Bandung: PPs Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
  7. Sapa’at, Asep. (2014). “Kemana Arah Pendidikan Indonesia?.” Online. http://www.republika.co.id/berita/pendidikan/eduaction/14/02/27/n1nns0-kemana-arah- pendidikan-indonesia (Diakses Jumat 12 Desember 2014 pukul 19.00 Wib).
  8. Slavin, R. E. (2010). Cooperative Learning. Teori, Riset, dan Praktik. Bandung: Nusa Media.
  9. Smith, Ken. (1997). Active Maths, Problem Solving Maths for 10 – 12 Year Old Students. Perth: Ready-Ed Publications.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.