Article Sidebar

Article 02
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 26 Download : 9

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the implementation of a problem-solving approach and its corresponding impact on the creative thinking ability of prospective mathematics teachers. A qualitative case study approach was used in this study in the form of observations of learning and teaching processes for geometry topics through the use of a problem-solving approach and of a written test involving 20 prospective mathematics teachers, in one of the state universities in Bandung, Indonesia. The results showed that the implemented problem-solving approach influenced prospective mathematics teachers’ creative thinking in solving problems. The use of different strategies showed prospective teachers’ creative thinking ability in problem-solving processes. The effect of the problem-solving approach on prospective mathematics teachers can be investigated further to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of creative thinking ability.



DOI : https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.16.3.17820.257-268

Keywords

Creative Thinking Ability Problem-solving Approach Geometry Education Prospective Mathematics Teachers

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Al Jupri, Asep Syarif Hidayat

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA).

How to Cite
Al Jupri, & Hidayat, A. S. (2024). Problem-solving Approach and Its Impact on Creative Thinking Ability of Prospective Mathematics Teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 16(3), 257–268. Retrieved from https://jpm.ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jpm/article/view/144
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Almeida, L. S., Prieto, L. P., Ferrando, M., Oliveira, E., & Ferrándiz, C. (2008). Torrance test of creative thinking: The question of its construct validity. Thinking skills and creativity, 3(1), 53-
  2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2008.03.003
  3. Barham, A. I. (2020). Investigating the development of pre-Service teachers' problem-solving strategies via problem-solving mathematics Classes. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 129-141. https://doi.org/0.12973/eu-jer.9.1.129
  4. Birgili, B. (2015). Creative and critical thinking skills in problem-based learning environments. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 2(2), 71-80. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jgedc/issue/38680/449365
  5. Cansoy, R., & Türkoglu, M. E. (2017). Examining the relationship between pre-service teachers' critical thinking disposition, problem solving skills and teacher self-efficacy. International Education Studies, 10(6), 23-35. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n6p23
  6. Capraro, M. M., An, S. A., Ma, T., Rangel-Chavez, A. F., & Harbaugh, A. (2012). An investigation of preservice teachers’ use of guess and check in solving a semi open-ended mathematics problem. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(1), 105-116.
  7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.10.002
  8. Cenberci, S. (2018). The investigation of the creative thinking tendency of prospective mathematics teachers in terms of different variables. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(9), 78-85. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i9.3434
  9. Dhayanti, D., Johar, R., & Zubainur, C. M. (2018). Improving students' critical and creative thinking through realistic mathematics education using Geometer's Sketchpad. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 3(1), 25-35. Retrieved from http://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/jramathedu
  10. Dickman, B. (2016). Looking back to support problem solving. The Mathematics Teacher, 110(1), 54-
  11. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.110.1.0054
  12. Gridos, P., Avgerinos, E., Mamona-Downs, J., & Vlachou, R. (2022). Geometrical figure apprehension, construction of auxiliary lines, and multiple solutions in problem solving: Aspects of mathematical creativity in school geometry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(3), 619-636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10155-4
  13. Jamaludin, A., & Hung, D. (2017). Problem-solving for STEM learning: Navigating games as narrativized problem spaces for 21st century competencies. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0038-0
  14. Jupri, A., & Syaodih, E. (2016). Between formal and informal thinking: The use of algebra for solving geometry problems from the perspective of Van Hiele theory. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 21(2), 108-113. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v21i2.817
  15. Jupri, A. (2017). From geometry to algebra and vice versa: Realistic mathematics education principles for analyzing geometry tasks. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1830, No. 1, p. 050001). AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4980938
  16. Jupri, A., Gozali, S.M., & Usdiyana, D. (2020). An analysis of a geometry learning process: The case of proving area formulas. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 154-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/prima.v4i2.2619
  17. Koichu, B., & Leron, U. (2015). Proving as problem solving: The role of cognitive decoupling. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 40, 233-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.10.005
  18. Leikin, R., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2013). Creativity and mathematics education: The state of the art.
  19. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(2), 159-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0459-1 Leong, Y. H., Toh, T. L., Tay, E. G., Quek, K. S., & Dindyal, J. (2012). Relooking ‘Look Back’: A
  20. student's attempt at problem solving using Polya's model. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 43(3), 357-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2011.618558
  21. Levav-Waynberg, A., & Leikin, R. (2012a). Using multiple solution tasks for the evaluation of students’ problem-solving performance in geometry. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 12(4), 311-333.
  22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2012.732191
  23. Levav-Waynberg, A., & Leikin, R. (2012b). The role of multiple solution tasks in developing knowledge and creativity in geometry. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(1), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.11.001
  24. Mrayyan, S. (2016). Investigating mathematics teacher’s role to improve students’ creative thinking. American Journal of Educational Research, 4(1), 82-90. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-4- 1-13
  25. Palatnik, A., & Dreyfus, T. (2019). Students’ reasons for introducing auxiliary lines in proving situations. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 55, 100679.
  26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.10.004
  27. Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (second edition). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc773pk
  28. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2013). Reflections on problem solving theory and practice. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 10(1), 9-34. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1258
  29. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. Journal of Education, 196(2), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600202
  30. Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM, 29(3), 75-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-997-0003-x
  31. Taback, S. F. (1988). The wonder and creativity in “looking back” at problem solutions. The Mathematics Teacher, 81(6), 429-434. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.81.6.0429
  32. Tjoe, H. (2019). “Looking Back” to solve differently: Familiarity, fluency, and flexibility. In P. Liljedahl P., & M. Santos-Trigo (Eds.), Mathematical Problem Solving (pp. 3-20). ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10472-6_1
  33. Yuwono, M. R. (2016). Analysis of student difficulties in solving geometry problems based on Bloom's taxonomy and their alternative solutions [in Bahasa]. Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 9(2), 111–133. https://dx.doi.org/10.20414/betajtm.v9i2.7

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.